Time to kick off some NSW state election analysis, much of it in broad and general terms. I haven't done the usual seat-modelling yet; that will follow in a week or two.
Feds Will Destroy Everything
A
common theme on this website is the massive influence of which party holds power federally on state elections. While this impact is not obvious in every election, and isn't even present in a few, there is a long-established pattern that is the very first thing anybody looking at state elections needs to know. Once a party has been in government federally for any length of time at all, it starts tending to shed seats in state elections. This process continues until it has lost most if not all of the states, and not long after that it will probably lose federally as well. A new federal government comes in with massive majorities in many states, and then starts losing those. Rinse and repeat.
Since the Liberal-National Coalition came to power federally it has faced four state elections, winning only Tasmania where an ancient Labor government could not escape retribution for a deeply disliked coalition with the Greens. This happened while the federal government was still relatively new. However, the Coalition has also lost office in Victoria and Queensland and failed to win in South Australia. The Victorian result was no surprise, SA was a vaguely forgiveable case of
electoral geography 1, 2PP vote 0, but the Queensland result was an earthquake. The government that had won office with a record majority only three years earlier, almost wiping its predecessor out of Parliament, was sent packing (by one seat) with a 14% swing against it. The LNP's aggressive and divisive born-to-rule approach in office had done it no favours but things would have been very different had Julia Gillard still been in the Lodge.
With declining levels of rusted-on adherence to both major parties, there's just no such thing any more as a win so big that you cannot possibly waste it in a single term. That applies especially when the prevailing wind from Canberra is not in a party's favour. In fact, the idea that a seat margin at one election determines the seat margin at the next is overrated anyway - what winning big really does is just gives a party a lot of seats in which it has new personal votes. It turns out that in NSW even that doesn't apply much this time around. So is there such a thing as an election that is too hard to lose, or is nothing actually safe in state politics anymore?