2019 Queensland Senate
Outgoing Senators: 2 LNP 2 ALP 1 Green, Fraser Anning
Seats won: 2 LNP (Paul Scarr, Susan Macdonald), 1 Labor (Nina Green)
Four-way fight for three seats with one to lose: Gerard Rennick (LNP), Chris Ketter (Labor), Malcolm Roberts (One Nation), Larissa Waters (Green)
Rennick and Roberts are overwhelmingly likely to win; Waters is most likely to win final seat
Final result won't be known for certain until the button is pressed
Warning - Senate races are complex! This article has been rated Wonk Factor 4/5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donations welcome!
If you find my coverage useful please consider donating to support the large amount of time I spend working on this site. Donations can be made by the Paypal button in the sidebar or email me via the address in my profile for my account details. Please only donate if you are sure you can afford to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label Larissa Waters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Larissa Waters. Show all posts
Saturday, May 25, 2019
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
More Section 44 Cases In Spotlight
A very long time ago now two Greens Senators resigned after discovering they were dual citizens. The Senate will refer their cases to the Court of Disputed Returns (typically the High Court) which will determine whether they were eligible to have been elected in the first place and, assuming that they weren't, will initiate a "special count" to fill their places. In the weeks since then, however, many more MPs have come under the spotlight of the dual citizenship rule in Section 44 of the Constitution, and it's unlikely it has claimed its final victim yet.
The Constitution is very black and white about dual citizenships - section 44 says that if you are a citizen of another country, you are not eligible to be chosen or to sit in Parliament. It doesn't seem to allow any ifs or buts about all that. However, the High Court in Sykes v Cleary [1992] found that the Constitution was unrealistic and had to be "read down". After all, if it were that straightforward then another nation could maliciously impose citizenship on Australian MPs and refuse to withdraw it. Alternatively, for a given citizen of a given nation, procedures for getting rid of an unwanted citizenship might be unrealistically expensive, time-consuming, slow, dangerous, unreliable or unreasonable.
The Constitution is very black and white about dual citizenships - section 44 says that if you are a citizen of another country, you are not eligible to be chosen or to sit in Parliament. It doesn't seem to allow any ifs or buts about all that. However, the High Court in Sykes v Cleary [1992] found that the Constitution was unrealistic and had to be "read down". After all, if it were that straightforward then another nation could maliciously impose citizenship on Australian MPs and refuse to withdraw it. Alternatively, for a given citizen of a given nation, procedures for getting rid of an unwanted citizenship might be unrealistically expensive, time-consuming, slow, dangerous, unreliable or unreasonable.
Saturday, July 15, 2017
Scott Ludlam Mess Scores Four Bob Days Out Of Five
Well here we go again. After the departures of Senators-who-sort-of-never-were Rod Culleton and Bob Day we've lost another one. After nine years in the Senate, one of the sharper minds in the place, Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, has suddenly realised he has been a dual New Zealand citizen all along and was never validly elected in the first place. That sound you heard all afternoon was at least 200,000 Greens supporters banging their heads on the nearest available tree in disbelief. As for me, I was so distracted by this situation that I needlessly got off a bus in the middle of Hobart city, forgetting it continued past a common stopping point to much closer to home. No problem though, since I then managed to beat the bus to its next stop on foot and catch the same bus again. Ludlam's path to getting his seat back, should he want to, would be rather less straightforward.
For the most part this one is a familiar situation. Although Ludlam has resigned, the fact that he has raised eligibility issues as his reason for doing so should prompt an immediate referral to the Court of Disputed Returns (the High Court in theory though it may well get kicked downstairs to the Federal Court if there are no new legal issues) to determine whether Ludlam was validly elected in the first place (to which the answer is evidently no) and to supervise the filling of the vacancy. The vacancy will be filled by a recount (called a "special count") as with the vacancies for Day and Culleton. The Greens won two seats in the original election and in the Culleton recount, beating the WA Nationals' Kado Muir by 25175 votes in both cases. The recount could shave a few thousand off this (about 2800 personal votes for Ludlam leak out of the Greens ticket based on the original counts) but there's no doubt the Greens would keep two seats. One of these will be their other existing Senator, Rachel Siewert, and the other will be the third candidate on the original ticket, Jordon Steele-John.
However this recount does raise some new ground. Firstly it's the first time a state will have had to be recounted for two disqualifications from the same election, meaning that the new count will be without both Culleton and Ludlam. Secondly and more interestingly, it creates previously unseen complications with the original allocation of three and six year terms. Scott Ludlam was elected third in 2016 with Rachel Siewert elected 12th. In the special count to replace Ludlam, Siewert will be elected third and Steele-John will be elected 12th. So if Steele-John replaces Ludlam and serves out Ludlam's term, then this will create a bizarre situation of the candidate second on the Greens ticket being a Senator for three years while the third candidate on the ticket is a Senator for the balance of six, clearly not the preference of the party's voters.
For the most part this one is a familiar situation. Although Ludlam has resigned, the fact that he has raised eligibility issues as his reason for doing so should prompt an immediate referral to the Court of Disputed Returns (the High Court in theory though it may well get kicked downstairs to the Federal Court if there are no new legal issues) to determine whether Ludlam was validly elected in the first place (to which the answer is evidently no) and to supervise the filling of the vacancy. The vacancy will be filled by a recount (called a "special count") as with the vacancies for Day and Culleton. The Greens won two seats in the original election and in the Culleton recount, beating the WA Nationals' Kado Muir by 25175 votes in both cases. The recount could shave a few thousand off this (about 2800 personal votes for Ludlam leak out of the Greens ticket based on the original counts) but there's no doubt the Greens would keep two seats. One of these will be their other existing Senator, Rachel Siewert, and the other will be the third candidate on the original ticket, Jordon Steele-John.
However this recount does raise some new ground. Firstly it's the first time a state will have had to be recounted for two disqualifications from the same election, meaning that the new count will be without both Culleton and Ludlam. Secondly and more interestingly, it creates previously unseen complications with the original allocation of three and six year terms. Scott Ludlam was elected third in 2016 with Rachel Siewert elected 12th. In the special count to replace Ludlam, Siewert will be elected third and Steele-John will be elected 12th. So if Steele-John replaces Ludlam and serves out Ludlam's term, then this will create a bizarre situation of the candidate second on the Greens ticket being a Senator for three years while the third candidate on the ticket is a Senator for the balance of six, clearly not the preference of the party's voters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)