Wrapup (Saturday Nov 1):
With the pressing of the final button in Launceston a few hours ago it's pretty much time to bring a close to my coverage of the Hobart and other Tasmanian local government elections and turn my attention to the deluge of Victorian and other state polls that I've neglected while this has been on. If there are any post-count resignations then I will put up separate threads for the recounts to fill them.
Interest levels have been tremendous with both this page and the Hobart guide logging nearly 8,000 pageviews so far, each from nearly 3,000 unique visitors. Unique pageviews on Tuesday and Wednesday were at levels comparable to the busiest days of the federal election campaign. I think this all says something against the idea that people are not interested in local government. I'd like to thank readers for their interest, especially those who threw in a few hundred dollars in donations between them, which I definitely felt like I'd earned after 13 hours working more or less flat out on Tuesday. It would be great to provide this level of coverage for more councils in 2018, but to do that there need to be more of me!
So what have we found out, especially from Hobart but also from the other results?
ELECTORAL, POLLING AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS, COMMENT AND NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CLARK (PART OF WHICH IS NOW HAVING ITS WORST COUNCIL ELECTION EVER). IF USING THIS SITE ON MOBILE YOU CAN SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK "VIEW WEB VERSION" TO SEE THE SIDEBAR FULL OF GOODIES.
Showing posts with label reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reports. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
Denison Ballot Papers Damage Report Released
In the first few months of this year, this site provided extensive coverage of the Tasmanian state elections. In my Denison post-count thread I touched on an unusual incident that happened during the counting of postal ballot papers, in which the incorrect operation of a letter-opening machine damaged over 2000 ballots. Announcements at the time said that 163 ballots (a number later reduced slightly, then increased again) were "irreparably damaged and have had to be treated as informal."
At the time there was a clear danger of this damage affecting the close contest between Madeleine Ogilvie and Julian Amos for the final seat (ultimately won by Ogilvie after two lead changes during the distribution of preferences). In the end the margin of 331 votes was large enough that it was clear the Tasmanian Electoral Commission had dodged the 2013 WA Senate count bullet. But this is not only clear because the final margin was of that size, but also because of some advantages of Hare-Clark over the current Senate system.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)