Friday, August 28, 2026

Secret Harbour By-Election: Prospects And Live

Secret Harbour (ALP 11.54%)
George Tree (ALP) vs Luke Herdegen (ON), Ryan Robertson (Lib) and way too many others
Cause of by-election: resignation of Paul Papalia (ALP)

CALLED (9:34) One Nation gain from Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary (Comments scrolling up with latest first - refresh for latest comments)

Sunday 10:50 am I am not sure we'll ever see a Labor vs Liberal 2PP for this seat but I estimate that the Liberals would have won it, around 52-48 (by normal preference flows it would be around 53 but I have reduced that on account of it being a normally weak seat).  This suggests Labor would have lost this seat even without the One Nation surge.  Given that the average swing in government by-elections is around 5% an implied swing of 13.5% is high, but also Labor are coming off a still high baseline from the last election, which would account for some of it.  

With results like this there is always a lot of talk about high swings, but the 2CP swing is not meaningful as it is not the same combatants.  The swing against the Labor 2CP is what I call a pseudo-swing; both the pseudo-swing and my estimate of the 2PP swing are lower than in Rockingham 2023.

Sunday 6:00 am What has happened in the prepolls is that Herdegen has actually got a preference flow more like I was expecting for the by-election as a whole, 52.8% (which is not surprising given how strong the prepolls were on primaries for One Nation), and so the result has gone back to the high 50s, 57-43 at present, that was expected before the bad preference flows came in.  Overall now One Nation has 49% of preferences.  From the primaries I would have expected them to get about 52.7% without considering the ballot order, which would close at least a little of the gap.  

10:30 End of night wrap: The story of this by-election is mostly in the primary votes.  It was to be expected that all else equal One Nation could push well over 30 while Labor would drop into the same sort of range, but there was more to see than that:  39% for One Nation is above expectations and sub-25 for Labor isn't acceptable.  The Liberal primary is slightly higher than expected and I think they might have taken bites from Labor too, though it appears that for whatever reasons the Liberal flow to One Nation was quite weak.  This is a result that will resonate beyond WA and beyond Labor's candidate choice issues here because it does suggest that outer suburban seats with conventionally high One Nation votes are at risk.  

10:17 Just as I was thinking the prepoll would surely be many more hours or tomorrow it has dropped!  Herdegen is on an extremely strong 42.3% in it and One Nation have obviously now won.  They may well end up pushing 56-44.  

10:11 A riveting battle for last between Paul Gullan (23 votes) and Peter Dunne (26).  Legalise Cannabis have done okay and may or may not get their deposit back depending on prepolls.  

10:04 All booths except Secret Harbour EPP (day booth and prepoll) are in and it's still 53.9-46.1.  At the present rate I don't think I'll be staying up to see if the EPP reports tonight.  

9:50 I momentarily posted that I was calling this but that was based on a massive miscalculation of what Labor needed off the prepolls, so I've removed that - they simply need to about reverse what One Nation has done so far.  Nonetheless I think there is pretty much no chance anyway that Labor can do well enough to pull back the One Nation lead.  

9:27 Herdegen now out to a live lead 53.9-46.1. 

9:05 Another pile of postals has arrived (not yet counted to 2CP) which has done nothing for Labor's position; indeed my live projection is out to 53.3.  (Edit: Coastal Lakes College primaries have put it back to 53.1 but I think that's too low because of the size of the postal vote).  

8:57 William Bowe says the prepoll will report in two stages, firstly its day booth numbers and then the prepolls.  

8:40 Now projecting the two booths with outstanding 2CPs to turn a current 53.2 into 53.1.  Some more theories on the weak preference flow to Herdegen - firstly as a youngish candidate with a drug history he might not be playing well on preferences with older Liberal voters, though it seems not to be hurting his primary vote which is super-strong.  Secondly his position on the ballot paper is poor for catching preferences from the Liberals (indeed a few percent of the Liberal votes will just be donkeys).  

8:14 With the strong postal preference flow added to the model my live count estimate is now 52.6.  Closely matching the live total because there are not that many booth votes to be added to the 2CP.  Labor would need to comfortably win prepolls although they are probably losing day votes and that seems incredibly unlikely so I've now put One Nation back to expected win status.  

8:10 I've now got a variable flow model going and I'm projecting One Nation to 51.6 on the currently counted primaries - excluding the two remaining booths and prepolls.  The prepolls will decide if Labor has any chance left.  

8:02 Couple more booths in were pretty horrible for Labor on primaries.  Off the booths counted to primaries I'm projecting One Nation to 51.4% but that's on the preference flows from the booths counted to 2CP, and I think the flow to them will go up.  So One Nation clearly favoured again but I doubt it will be the huge win it earlier looked like.

7:57 I think the flows to One Nation may improve with more counting - both the booths counted have high Green votes.  But still, while they may be ahead it's probably not by a lot.  

7:46 And now some preference flows.  In Comet Bay College Herdegen is getting 43.9% and in Port Kennedy Primary he is getting 35.8%.  These are way, way weaker than I expected - maybe there's a Hastie factor here!  This aint over yet.  If these flows continue it will project to close to the wire - need to see more booths.

7:37 Couple of booths in, Comet Bay College with Herdegen 36.9 Tree 26 Robertson 14.4 Greens 9.6 and Port Kennedy Primary with Herdegen 32.9 Tree 28.2 Greens 14.0 Robertson 9.4.  Overall Labor are now 8.6% behind on primaries with the Liberals way ahead of the Greens so this is looking like a big win for One Nation.  

7:31 Mobiles have been added, highly unrepresentative with a strong Liberal vote.  (PollBludger was showing these as the WAEC prepoll but this has been corrected.)  The postals have been augmented with 2597 in now and now Herdegen has 35.5% to Tree 25.6% so a slight improvement for Labor there.  Notably the Poll Bludger projection has already called the seat.  

7:17 VOTES! We have 1277 postals and they are very nice indeed for Herdegen, he's on 35.9% to Tree 25.0% Robertson 18.8% the Greens have 7.8%, Legalise Cannabis 3.0% and the rest have nothing much (Paul Gullan has literally one vote).  Of course postals will favour the conservative side so this will come back but when the postals are projecting at something like 57-43 to One Nation (my estimate) this is going to take some serious coming back from.  Especially as postals are likely to favour the Liberals more than One Nation.

7:00 First hour down and nothing to see.  

6:35 Casey Briggs notes that 50.1% of enrolment voted before today, turnout will probably only be 80 or so so that doesn't leave much for the booths.  

6:05 Game on! Awaiting first numbers, this could be a while unless we get a little drop of mobile votes or something.  William Bowe relates that the WAEC doesn't disclose who the 2CP count is until they're confident they have the right pair, though in this case there's a good chance that won't take long.  While we wait you may be amused to note that in the 1990 Maylands by-election one Arthur Galletly (IND) scored a heroic 0.07% (12 votes), which I think even the worst of this lot could have their work cut out to get under.  He was one of six indies to get less than 1% in that one.  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is another combined prospects/live (with added snark) post for a state by-election of unusual interest.  Since One Nation surged into contention in national polling, there have been three by-elections involving the party: Farrer where it was very obvious they were the favourites, Nepean where they were not given any real chance of winning, and this one which is on paper a lot more up for grabs.  This is a key test of whether One Nation can deliver in the kinds of outer suburban seats that need to be the second string in their bow alongside rural seats if they are to break into parliaments in a big way.  That said it is a by-election and a win will not necessarily guarantee that they can do it at a competitive general election.  

Secret Harbour, on Perth's far southern outskirts and overlapping just into Mandurah, is a traditionally very strong Labor seat versus Liberals (it and its predecessors Peel and Warnbro have never been even close to marginal). But is also a seat where One Nation poll way above their average.  In 2025 it was One Nation's sixth best seat statewide in the Assembly (with 8.43% of the vote, less than a point off their best, behind only four rural seats and adjacent Mandurah).  However that is a tad misleading as they drew the top position on the ballot.  It was still their ninth best Legislative Council seat (the more reliable indicator of party strength) with 6.07% of the vote compared to a state total of 3.84%.

In the just-released DemosAU state poll, One Nation is getting 21% statewide.  Experience in peak elections like Queensland 1998 and SA 2026 is that One Nation surge more than uniform swing would expect in areas they were already doing well in.  If a normal election were to occur right now, then based off that poll One Nation would expect something like 30% in Secret Harbour.  And this is a by-election which is an opportunity to kick an incumbent government.  So except perhaps for the large field size it is easy to put One Nation north of 30.

Labor for its part is coming off a 46.5% primary in 2025 but is down 8.4 points in the DemosAU poll and this would be without considering the usual by-election factors of a seat being vacant and any extra kicking of the government.  On this basis it's easy to put Labor and One Nation in close enough to the same place on primaries (maybe Labor just a little ahead, on paper) and at the mercy of the size and preference flow strengths from mainly the Liberals and Greens. The Liberals shouldn't get a large vote though they should beat their 13.2% from 2021, especially after drawing the top of the ballot.  The Greens polled 8.8% in 2025 and are unlikely to match that in a crowded field.  Legalise Cannabis tend to do well here though it will be interesting to see how much One Nation tread on their toes, and the rest including some of Australia's most infamous serial candidates will be scrapping for detritus unless any of the indies can get anything.  I'll be watching how many deposits come back, but more than five would be a surprise, it might not even be that many.

There has been no real polling for this seat, just the West Australian embarrassing itself again by pretending that 120 is a sample size.  As William Bowe notes the 2025 election did not go well for their "exit polls".

Candidate Factors

This by-election is unusual in that although Labor and One Nation are the obvious frontrunners on paper both are running questionable candidates.  I doubt the news that Labor's Georgia Tree is on leave from Woodside lobbying will concern more than a handful of voters in a seat infested with tradies.  The fact that she lives 60 km outside the seat, and worse still in inner suburbia, despite having grown up in Warnbro might not go down as well.  

On the One Nation side, gym owner Luke Herdegen has attracted ripples mainly for news that he spent most of 2016 in a bowl of cocaine, from which he took brief breaks to consort with the Albanian underworld and lose at least one multi-millionaire girlfriend, like you do.  He's turned his life around but it does irk me when people support tough on crime policies when they themselves would not have been running for office had they been caught.  (Not that One Nation really care about drugs that much anyway, with the exception of puberty blockers.)  The media trail has gone quiet since the initial revelations rather than it turning into an embattled candidate saga and we will see if the voters care about this stuff either.  

The Liberals have copped flak from Canning federal MP Andrew Hastie, whose seat overlaps most of this one, for not trying to beat One Nation.  If One Nation win or at least thrash the Liberals there will be a strong sense they are coming for him (as if an endless stream of MRP projections where he loses the seat to One Nation 40-60 isn't enough foreboding yet; not everyone believes them.)

My view of this one overall is a win is a win is a win, both for Labor and One Nation.  It would be nice to win by lots but unlike a lot of by-elections there is no such thing as winning by not enough.  A close loss is no disaster for either side but if it's a substantial loss (46-54 or worse) then questions will have to be asked.  For Labor - you threw the kitchen sink at this in spending terms, was it your candidate selection or the feds what did it?  For One Nation - if you can't get close here and in a by-election (and after making very confident noises about it in the leadup) then precisely where, are you for real or is it just a bubble?  And so on.  

(One Nation are very confident and a Labor MP stating "We've lost this" on election eve seems to go a little beyond the usual ALP line in pessimistic expectation management.  For those following betting, which is amusing but not predictive, One Nation have been plunging and as of election day 8:30 am are at 2.25 vs 1.55, implied 41% chance)

Electoral Act Sooking

One of my pet themes is that for a party that claims to not care about expressing views that often cause offence, One Nation are often a bunch of sooks.  No more the case than with this complaint about a Labor attack flier where One Nation are alleging the flier is improperly authorised.  There is no requirement in the WA Electoral Act that both sides of a flier be authorised.  There is a requirement that both sides of a how-to-vote card be authorised, but only if both sides contain how-to-vote recommendations.

Election night

The day booth lineup is the same as in 2025 except that the Madora Bay booth has moved about 1.5 km to the north.  Also the Secret Harbour EPP polling place is open on election day, which I don't think it was in 2025.  Absent votes don't exist in by-elections but an odd thing with this one is that Labor did really badly on those on a 2PP basis in 2025 anyway.  Voting before the election is reported as being up by thousands on the combined postal and prepoll vote from 2025 so the count for the main prepoll could be a long one.  The huge number of pointless candidates will slow down counting too and it will be interesting to see if the WAEC can rebound after a 2025 election performance that ended with the then Commissioner resigning.

Tune in for an interesting count - comments from close of polls on, scrolling to the top.

Friday, August 21, 2026

EMRS: Thirty Or Turkey By Christmas?

EMRS Lib 26 (+1) ALP 23 (-1) ON 21 (+2) Grn 16 (+2) IND 14 (-2) others 1 (-1)

Seat estimate (new boundaries) Lib 10 ALP 9 ON 8 Green 5 IND 3

The latest EMRS poll is out as released on the Poll Position pod and the changes on state voting intentions are all within the in-theory margin of error from the previous edition.  There would be mild relief for the government that the dramatic slide in its numbers in the past few polls has stopped.  But political tragics could only have eyes for the ALP figure after leader Josh Willie was reported to have set a target of polling a 30% primary by Christmas.  (Something I somehow, in a feat tantamount to winning the Last Man contest for not knowing the Superbowl winner, managed to not find out about for a month!)  

This figure has led to predictable jibes from opponents that not only will Labor not attain this heroic goal (oh for the days when they were forever stuck around 30) but that Willie will instead be gone as leader by Christmas. Although Labor's primary has actually held up better to the One Nation surge than might have been expected, there seems to be an unusual level of Labor leadership chatter about.  It's hard to tell if it is serious or if a lot of people are just and quite rightly bored.  Some of it is connected to the issue that continues to dog (pun intended) the Opposition, with a Thick Of It style nadir when Willie was photographed defending Labor's unfashionable support for greyhound racing in front of a Dogs Prohibited sign. 

Four Year Terms? Fixed Terms? Fixed Four Year Terms? Part One - Polling

This week there was an article regarding a report released by a lobby group called 4 Year Terms Australia, which supports "fixed" four year terms for federal parliament.  The SMH report contained this very brief comment regarding polling:

"Polling commissioned from JWS Research found just one in five Australians supported the current system of three-year terms and the prime minister choosing the election date."

Well, from that it may sound like Australians would strongly support "fixed" four year terms, right?  In fact the polling cited tells a rather different story.

I've decided to write one article on this subject dealing mainly with the polling, to be probably (subject to time) followed by another in the near future dealing with the (de)merits of the issue.  That said there will be few surprises on the latter front to anyone who's seen my article re fixed terms in Tasmania or my 2025 JSCEM submission.   To summarise my views, I'm totally against "fixed" federal terms, whether by legislation or referendum.  I think that fixed term laws either fail to genuinely secure fixed dates or else prevent Prime Ministers from calling elections in circumstances where they should be able to.  I'm also against four year federal terms if it means eight year Senators.  

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Group Ticket Voting In Victoria Is Finally Gone!

Today is Victoria's first day since the mid-2000s without Group Ticket Voting in state elections.  Legislation to abolish the system received Royal Assent yesterday.  It could still in theory be challenged in court but I doubt that would go too well for the challenger after the failed Bob Day federal challenge.

There's a saying that success has many fathers while failure is an orphan.  Meaning that when something good happens a lot of people suddenly want to claim the credit.  

Since group ticket voting was abolished in Victoria we've seen, for instance, GetUp! claiming partial credit for their petition which highlighted the recent attempt by Avi Yemini and others to register fake parties.  Yemini's defenders (including Topher Field in a ridiculous video where he abusively misunderstands comments to the Guardian by yours truly) have been out saying GetUp! and others who reacted were just "useful idiots" and their tactic with the fake parties was to generate exactly such outrage against group ticket voting to increase the chance of it being scrapped.  Well, to be useful idiots you firstly have to be useful so this suggests that GetUp! actually did do something after all.  I will say here that at least GetUp! only claimed partial credit while Yemini and co have had no compunction about claiming the lot.  But I'm not sure GetUp!'s petition with 22000+ "signatures" was ever even presented to anybody! I am nonetheless glad that they raised awareness of the issue.

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Group Ticket Voting: Going, Going ... ? (Rolling Thread)

GTV repeal has passed Assembly unanimously and Legislative Council with a handful of votes against.

-----------------------

There is more encouraging news on the Group Ticket Voting front today with the Allan Carroll Government finally amid the chaos introducing a Bill to scrap group ticket voting in the Victorian Legislative Council, called the Electoral Amendment (Miscellaneous Matters) Bill 2026.  This rolling thread will follow what happens with this Bill during the week and what is in it.  (A note that I am tracking the registration of deceptively named parties for the Victorian election in this prior post.)

What is known so far is that the Bill will "remove group voting tickets from Legislative Council elections and prescribe a new method for voting above the line, requiring electors to number at least five groups in order of preference. The bill will also make other consequential and miscellaneous amendments to clarify and improve the operation of the Electoral Act and the electoral system in Victoria."

This establishes that the Bill will support a semi-optional Senate-style preferential system (possibly the simple "five above or five below" option), presumably with savings provisions for voters who number fewer above the line boxes.  This is the sensible choice as it encourages preference flows compared to a fully optional preferencing version as in states with lower quotas.

Not-A-Poll Reset 2 of 2026: Allan Resigns

It's another success for voters in the Next Leader To Go Not-A-Poll as the outright majority favourite was indeed the next leader to depart, improving the record of Not-A-Poll to 8/15 including six of the last seven.

When I opened voting on 13 February there was a spirited initial battle between Jacinta Allan and Angus Taylor with the lead swapping a few times over several hours.  In following days Allan built a large lead with for some reason a lot of votes for her on 18 and 20 February.  Over time this grew into a majority.  Allan was a promising bet because her dire leadership ratings and her party's wobbly voting intention polling suggested there were two different ways she could go, and nobody else seemed especially likely to go before the Victorian election.


Allan formally resigned but was facing an active challenge that appeared very likely to succeed.  Had Allan resisted (assuming she had sufficient signatures) there would have been a member ballot in which she would have needed an overwhelming margin to defeat Ben Carroll.  

Friday, July 24, 2026

Tasmania Redistribution: The Franklin Renaming Fiasco

In 1984 there was a proposal to rename the electorate that is now called Lyons (and was then called Wilmot) "Truganini".  For a little while this was being reported and discussed in papers, there was widespread opposition and the change was withdrawn.  Wilmot became Lyons instead.  I was twelve years old at the time and I remember this in broad outline.  But I wonder if the Augmented Electoral Commission's corporate memory goes back this far.  

Unfortunately we yet again have had a redistribution proposal for a Tasmanian electorate to have an Aboriginal name where that proposal has been supported out of pretty much nowhere and sparked significant opposition.  Last week's boundary announcement has seen 272 written submissions, most of them opposing the proposed replacement of the name Franklin with Tongerlongeter.

I want to contrast this with the process that led to the replacement of the name Denison with Clark.  By the time this change was made in the 2017 redistribution, there was a very well organised movement to change Denison to Clark.  This proposal had been active in the previous cycle and by the 2017 cycle its adherents included several prominent Tasmanians, judges, current and former politicians and there was even a petition supporting it.  It is true that the new name was not endorsed until the Augmented Electoral Commission stage but by that stage the proposal was so well known that anyone with anything to say had said it, and the change of name attracted only three further objections, I don't think any of them from Tasmanians.  People might have agreed or disagreed with the change but people knew why the change was being proposed, why Clark if there was a new name, and why there were objections to Denison.

Friday, July 17, 2026

Victoria 2026: The Election Where All Sorts Of Things Can Happen!

Victoria Aggregate Labor 26.0 Coalition 27.3 Green 12.8 One Nation 23.7 others 10.3
(polls are probably underestimating "others" vote)
2PP estimate 52.0 to Coalition vs ALP, shadow-2PP ALP 50.1 vs One Nation
Currently Coalition would be likely to govern in minority with One Nation support, with One Nation seat tally around the mid-teens
One Nation and Labor seat numbers are highly dependent on Coalition preferencing decisions
Both major parties are still capable of majority government with a modest swing from current primaries

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's been forever - largely because of the amount of work I had on in the first half of the year - since the last time I looked at Victorian state polling in the leadup to this year's election in any depth but finally a good time to do so has arrived.  What I see, at the moment, is a picture with a lot of possibilities.  Arguments can be made on current polling that the Allan Labor Government, while currently behind, is not far from surviving.  Arguments can also be made that it is not far from losing the election so badly that it may not even be the second party.  For now this is a really difficult election to model - much harder than South Australia - but perhaps by polling day things will get a lot clearer.  This one is a rather mathsy modelling article that has been rated 3/5 on the Wonk Factor scale.  

Thursday, July 16, 2026

Is Group Ticket Voting Really On The Way Out In Victoria?

The last week has brought the encouraging news via both The Age and The Herald-Sun that Victorian Labor is preparing legislation to scrap Group Ticket Voting at the last possible chance before this year's election. According to the reports, the legislation will be brought in in the sitting week starting July 28, and would presumably pass both houses quickly in order to meet the VEC's August deadline.  

Let's hope this is finally it for all this nonsense!  I understand the smaller parties may be reluctant to vote for a new system under which their chances of winning any seats are greatly reduced for now thanks to the Bracks Government's entrenchment blunders, so I'll cut them slack so long as they refrain from making false claims in defence of their position.  But if any major party stands in the way or does nothing this time then there is no excuse for them not caring about democracy.