Fitzgibbon's tweet attracted far more replies than likes. On Twitter this (with varying definitions, eg including or not including retweets as well as or instead of likes, where to set the cutoff etc) is known as being ratioed. The formula I use is simply (number of replies)/(number of likes), counting anything over 1 as an instance. While there are cases where tweets attract more replies than likes because they provoke a genuinely long discussion or outpourings of sympathy, these exceptions are very rare indeed (especially in politics). As a general rule, a tweet that is ratioed is so because it has been piled onto by opponents. Frequently there is a very good reason for that, but in politics the response can be affected by partisan bias.
Twitter ratios tend to fluctuate, and often a ratio that starts out enormous will modify a little as the initial wave of angry responses slows and more casual followers of the author of the tweet see it and like it. There are also some other aspects that affect the ratio for a tweet that gets an angry response:
1. Australian political Twitter is
heavily left-wing. Thus ratioed tweets by Coalition politicians are very common, by Labor politicians uncommon, and by Greens politicians ... I couldn't actually find one.*
A similar pattern is seen with Republicans and Democrats in the US. Media tweets are quite often ratioed, and this doesn't seem to have much to do with whether the media source is seen as right-wing or not. ABC tweets are often ratioed by the left if they are seen as letting the side down. (Labor politicans do get ratioed sometimes, but only for things like promoting the coal industry, trying to out-nasty the Coalition on refugees, particularly silly attacks on the Greens or
nobly standing up for the correct naming of foodstuffs.)
2. Prominent Coalition figures tend to get less severely ratioed than less prominent ones. This is because the less prominent ones may attract much the same chorus of opposition from left-wing opponents, but the more prominent ones have more likes from their followers to balance it out.
3. Replies can get more severely ratioed than original tweets (here's an example from
Alexander Downer with a 24.4 ratio). A reply, especially a quick one, will be seen by many people in the debate, but followers of the politician may only see it and like it if they are also following the person the politician is replying to.
Here's a good example of point 2. This tasteless Tony Abbott tweet claiming Bob Hawke as having "a Liberal head" almost as soon as Hawke had died has among the most replies of any ratioed Australian politics tweet I have seen, but its reply-to-likes ratio is "only" 4.11. (The most replied-to ratioed tweet I had found was one by
Pauline Hanson with over 7,000 replies, until it was overtaken in Sep 2021 by
this one by Patricia Karvelas with 18,000!)
Having established that the ratio is a very skewed metric, the following are, at the time of writing, all Australian political tweets with ratios exceeding 5 to 1 that I have found. They were found mostly using a range of search terms involving "ratio". More sophisticated Twitter analytics searching could well unearth many more. I have applied the following limitations:
(i) significant political figures/organisations or political media sources (as decided by me) only
(ii) must have at least 100 replies
(iii) must not be a reply (including any tweet that opens with a handle), with the exception of replies to self
Sometimes a ratioed tweet by a minor political figure might not be especially political. However if it is being ratioed for largely political reasons and is in some sense political I will treat it as such. Tweets by major political figures (including at least all federal MPs and state major party leaders) will be included even if they are completely and clearly apolitical.
The article will be edited from time to time to update the list, but a 72 hour cooling off period is applied before a tweet will be considered for inclusion. Disliked tweets tend to start with a very high ratio that cools off over subsequent hours and days. Please let me know of any over 72 hours old that I have missed. Once a tweet has been included in the top ten its ratios will be rechecked now and then. Where a tweet starts getting ratioed outside its first day in existence, the 72 hour period starts from when it started getting ratioed (this rule was added on 3 April 2020 and may be known as the "Sarina Russo clause".)
It is harder to find ratio cases before 2017 because the term "ratio" was less in vogue.
As a general comment, the massive abundance of Coalition tweets in this list just shows how Twitter doesn't reflect political reality. These people did, after all, win the 2019 election.
Now ex-politician Tim Wilson has by far the most tweets with a ratio exceeding 10-1 (22 such tweets). Paul Fletcher has six, Michael Sukkar has five and long-since ex-politician Alexander Downer has four., as does Dan Tehan The most featured media programs is ABC Insiders with six, three of them for featuring Angus Taylor. Alan Tudge has two top tens, one from while he was an MP and one after.
All top ten ratios were last rechecked together on 27 Dec 2021; some have been rechecked since. Ratios will fluctuate as accounts are deleted or tweets get stray late likes and replies.
(* Note added 9 July 2020 - there is one now after Adam Bandt said something very silly re Eden-Monaro!)
New rule added 1 Dec 2020, "coward tweet clause": where the original tweet limits who can reply to it, an alternative ratio measure (quote tweets divided by retweets or QT/RT) will be employed instead. My initial investigations have found that QT/RT is generally but not always somewhat lower than R/L and the two are usually fairly correlated. Seven of the top ten tweets by R/L as of 1 Dec 2020 are also in the top ten I could find by QT/RT, with Caleb Bond's tweet miles ahead of the others.
New rules added for replies and quote tweet changes 28 Sep 23, the "axe QandA now clause" Where a tweet has replies switched off inside the cooling-off period, the ratio used will be the last ratio I saw before replies were switched off, or the first one I saw after, whichever is higher. Also a note that there is no longer a count of quote tweets readily available so QT/RT may not be used while this remains the case.
Ratioed Tweets By Bernard Gaynor (section added 19 Feb 21)
On 16 Feb 2021 former Coalition staffer Brittany Higgins alleged she had been raped by another then-staffer in 2019 while working in the office of Defence Minister Lisa Reynolds. Issues regarding the appalling handling of the matter and who knew what about it when have been very prominent since and the story is developing.
Bernard Gaynor, a minor "religious right" figure with 4712 followers, made two tweets about the matter on 16 Feb 2021. One of the tweets was quote-tweeted by Dee Madigan and then heavily ratioed. Within its first 72 hours it was deleted by Twitter for breaching the Twitter rules, but another expressing equivalent sentiments is still up and now has a ratio of 33.84 (643-19) I decline to reproduce Gaynor's victim-blaming tweet.
On 17 Feb 2021 Gaynor made several more tweets on the same subject, three of which qualify with ratios of 63.33 (190-3), 6.93 (111-16) and 17.5 (175-10). He made further tweets connecting the issue to that of abortion, one of which now has a ratio of 41.25 (165-4).
Because of the extremity of Gaynor's views, their potential to flood the list, his relatively minor status and some potential for him to be banned from Twitter (here's hoping) I feel I should treat him separately for the time being.
Ratioed Tweets Not By Bernard Gaynor
1. David Van 54.33
This is an example of what might be called a "drive-by ratio" - Van's tweet was ratioed not so much for its content as because around the same time Senator Van was accused of making "dog noises" at Senator Lambie (which he denies though he admits to interjecting.) Many of the responses said "Woof".
2. Victorian Landlords 46.5
3. Alan Tudge 40.38 (replies disabled, QT/RT method)
4. Alan Tudge 35.75 (replies disabled, QT/RT method)
A typo here or was it? "schmo" is slang for an average nondescript person or also a jerk or stupid person.
5. Bevan Shields 29.04
Narrator: it wasn't a strike.
7. Mitch Fifield 27.83
Jaala's tweet here might be qualifying for something: https://twitter.com/techverbatim/status/1498076671617896448
ReplyDelete