Welcome to the sixth annual Ehrlich Awards for Wrong Predictions. I have to say from the outset, what a right bunch of wallies we have lined up this year for your amusement. Around the start of each year here I obtain and provide cheap gratification by outing the most amusingly, instructively or staggeringly foolish calls that I observe in or relating to the previous twelve months, in any field of interest to this site. The Ehrlichs are named for Paul Ehrlich, who not only lightened his bank balance when losing his famous bet with Julian Simon, but also lightened his credibility by making poor excuses for his defeat. For the groundrules see the first edition and for previous years click the Ehrlich Awards tab. A fairly common theme this year involves statements that can be taken literally as simply false claims of fact, but that also imply certain predictions about what will or won't happen down the track (in an election post-count for example).
ELECTORAL, POLLING AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS, COMMENT AND NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CLARK. THIS MACHINE KILLS BAD ELECTORAL SYSTEMS. IF USING THIS SITE ON MOBILE YOU CAN SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK "VIEW WEB VERSION" TO SEE THE SIDEBAR FULL OF GOODIES.
Showing posts with label Nicholls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicholls. Show all posts
Monday, January 1, 2018
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Queensland: The Election Polls Forgot
Queensland Aggregate: Labor 35.9 LNP 33.9 One Nation 13.3 Green 9.6 Other 7.3
2PP off this aggregate: 52.5 to Labor
Seat projection off this aggregate: Labor 51 LNP 37 PHON 3 KAP 2
(Greens may win 1-2 seats instead, but not enough reliable evidence re Greens' chances)
Uncertainties: limited polling dominated by a single pollster, change in preferencing method and likely preferencing behaviour
Nearly three years ago an incumbent Queensland government was leading about 52-48 in the polls and polling analysts generally though that it might lose but would probably be returned. We were wrong; it did very narrowly lose, mainly because of a radical shift in preferencing behaviour by voters for minor parties.
Three years later, some of the problems are the same. A radical shift in preferencing behaviour is possible in theory, because Pauline Hanson's One Nation was just a minor presence last election but is now gathering a double-digit vote. Moreover, some polls have showed One Nation voters as much more likely to preference the conservative side of politics than they used to be - a situation consistent with the party attracting a lot of ex-Coalition supporters.
2PP off this aggregate: 52.5 to Labor
Seat projection off this aggregate: Labor 51 LNP 37 PHON 3 KAP 2
(Greens may win 1-2 seats instead, but not enough reliable evidence re Greens' chances)
Uncertainties: limited polling dominated by a single pollster, change in preferencing method and likely preferencing behaviour
Nearly three years ago an incumbent Queensland government was leading about 52-48 in the polls and polling analysts generally though that it might lose but would probably be returned. We were wrong; it did very narrowly lose, mainly because of a radical shift in preferencing behaviour by voters for minor parties.
Three years later, some of the problems are the same. A radical shift in preferencing behaviour is possible in theory, because Pauline Hanson's One Nation was just a minor presence last election but is now gathering a double-digit vote. Moreover, some polls have showed One Nation voters as much more likely to preference the conservative side of politics than they used to be - a situation consistent with the party attracting a lot of ex-Coalition supporters.
Monday, October 2, 2017
Divergence In The Queensland Polls Is Caused By Preferences
Newspoll 53-47 to Labor, ReachTEL 52-48 to LNP - what gives?
A Queensland state election is coming soon, possibly very soon. Electoral history tells us little of what to expect here. First-term state governments are usually returned, as are state governments that are of the opposite party to the party in power federally. However, the former might not apply when the government was elected almost accidentally, and the latter is most at risk of falling over when a government has been a messy minority regime. But if we turn to polling for the answers, whether the Palaszczuk government is cruising or crashing depends on which pollster you ask.
Through 2017 there has been a major divergence between the media-commissioned polls of ReachTEL and those by the Galaxy stable (sometimes branded as Galaxy, sometimes as Newspoll). Three media ReachTEL polls have all shown the government trailing in the two-party-preferred contest (47% in February, 49% in June and 48% just now.) Three Galaxys and a Newspoll have all shown the government ahead (51% February, 52% May, 51% August, 53% July-September quarterly). On average, that's a 3.75-point two-party difference between the two stables, way too large over so many polls to be explained by chance or fluctuations from month to month in support. Either the truth is somewhere in the middle and an election now would be extremely close, or somebody is right and someone's wrong.
A Queensland state election is coming soon, possibly very soon. Electoral history tells us little of what to expect here. First-term state governments are usually returned, as are state governments that are of the opposite party to the party in power federally. However, the former might not apply when the government was elected almost accidentally, and the latter is most at risk of falling over when a government has been a messy minority regime. But if we turn to polling for the answers, whether the Palaszczuk government is cruising or crashing depends on which pollster you ask.
Through 2017 there has been a major divergence between the media-commissioned polls of ReachTEL and those by the Galaxy stable (sometimes branded as Galaxy, sometimes as Newspoll). Three media ReachTEL polls have all shown the government trailing in the two-party-preferred contest (47% in February, 49% in June and 48% just now.) Three Galaxys and a Newspoll have all shown the government ahead (51% February, 52% May, 51% August, 53% July-September quarterly). On average, that's a 3.75-point two-party difference between the two stables, way too large over so many polls to be explained by chance or fluctuations from month to month in support. Either the truth is somewhere in the middle and an election now would be extremely close, or somebody is right and someone's wrong.
Sunday, May 28, 2017
Queensland: One Nation Have Peaked, So Now What?
I last looked at Queensland state polling back in February, when a rampant One Nation were polling 23% in state voting intention and threatening to win something like 15 seats at the next state election. A lot has happened in the few months since. In the Western Australian state election, both the party itself and the Liberals' preference deal with it got found out in the heat of the campaign. What benefit on preferences accrued from the deal was drowned out by its distraction factor and damage to primary vote support for all involved.
As One Nation 2.0 comes under further scrutiny, it is under attack on two major fronts. Firstly there's the suggestion that the party is simply corrupt, as seen in the current scandals surrounding the undeclared provision of a plane by a property developer and the recording of a meeting in which James Ashby seems to have seriously suggested a blatant electoral expenses rort. Secondly, the party sends mixed messages about whether it is a purist party of revolt against existing politics, or an active inside player that wants to supplant the Nationals on the Coalition side. This is making it harder for it to take votes away from Labor.
As One Nation 2.0 comes under further scrutiny, it is under attack on two major fronts. Firstly there's the suggestion that the party is simply corrupt, as seen in the current scandals surrounding the undeclared provision of a plane by a property developer and the recording of a meeting in which James Ashby seems to have seriously suggested a blatant electoral expenses rort. Secondly, the party sends mixed messages about whether it is a purist party of revolt against existing politics, or an active inside player that wants to supplant the Nationals on the Coalition side. This is making it harder for it to take votes away from Labor.
Saturday, February 11, 2017
Queensland Galaxy Says Game On For PHON Balance Of Power
Queensland Galaxy: Labor 31 LNP 33 PHON 23 Green 8 KAP 3 Other 2
A Queensland state poll by Galaxy, published in the Courier-Mail, tells a story that should have both major parties quite concerned. If this poll is correct and typical, it is 1998 all over again and a bit more. Perhaps the current One Nation polling bubble will burst before an election that is possibly still most of a year away. If it doesn't, then a weakened minority government facing an unpopular opposition presents a dream scenario for Australia's number one nineties nostalgia party to break through at state level and obtain some serious power there. Whether it would manage to remain remotely united this time if it did, nobody knows.
The high One Nation vote should be considered no surprise following polls showing the party at 16% in Western Australia, 16.3% in NSW and 9.4% in Victoria. Queensland always was the party's strongest state. It's possible even that the figure is an underestimate, but I am not that convinced that One Nation voters are all that shy anymore.
Sample size issues aside (and I haven't seen the sample size for this poll yet) there is one big reason to treat this poll with unusual caution. It comes during a lousy news cycle for the government following the resignation of Transport Minister Stirling Hinchcliffe in response to a damning report on the failings of Queensland Rail. I would expect that event to be deflating Labor's primary vote, and everything I say below should be taken with that caveat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)