ELECTORAL, POLLING AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS, COMMENT AND NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CLARK. THIS MACHINE KILLS BAD ELECTORAL SYSTEMS. IF USING THIS SITE ON MOBILE YOU CAN SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK "VIEW WEB VERSION" TO SEE THE SIDEBAR FULL OF GOODIES.
Tuesday, May 18, 2021
Poll Roundup: Another Budget Rates Pretty Well As Early Election Talk Resumes
Sunday, February 7, 2021
How Much Does A Home State Federal Leader Matter In That State?
This piece came about, indirectly, because the Courier-Mail was printing silly sentences again. A piece commenced with the following lines:
"Kevin Rudd has refused to reveal whether under-pressure Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese can win Queensland despite the former Prime Minister joining him for day one of a whirlwind ‘jobs tour’ across the state.
[..]
Mr Albanese was joined by Mr Rudd on the pre-campaign hustings at Southbank – however the former Prime Minister declined to comment when asked by The Sunday-Mail about how or whether Labor could win the state."
Rudd claims he declined to comment because it was the Courier-Mail rather than because of the question. Whatever the facts in that regard, two things stood out to me in the opening line. Firstly there's the idea that the former Prime Minister is a divine revelator who can exclusively "reveal" facts about the prospects of Opposition Leaders in his state. Secondly, the idea that winning Queensland is a realistic or relevant goal for an Albanese-led ALP. After all, Labor currently needs an enormous 8.44% swing to win the 2PP in Queensland, and has only won the Queensland 2PP three times since the Second World War - 1961, 1990 and 2007, all of them by a whisker