Last week the UK had its second straight surprising election result. In 2015 an expected cliffhanger turned into an easy win for the Conservatives while in 2017 an expected landslide turned into a cliffhanger. The government went to the polls three years early (that's a whole term over here), supposedly in search of a strong mandate for its position on Brexit, yet came away with fewer seats than it went in with. The real motive seemed to be to turn a big lead in the polls into a bigger majority, and if that was the aim then it backfired spectacularly.
In the wake of this result the Australian commentariat have put out several articles that seek to stress parallels with Australian politics. The primary themes of these articles are as follows: that Malcolm Turnbull is Theresa May and that Anthony Albanese is Jeremy Corbyn.
Let's start with the Turnbull-May comparison. Turnbull has no hope of winning the battle of perceptions on this one, because it's the kind of analogy many of those who consume political chatter will congratulate themselves on having thought of first. But on a factual basis, the comparison is twaddle.
ELECTORAL, POLLING AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS, COMMENT AND NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CLARK. NOW I WILL NEVER KNOW IF THE SPORTS VOUCHERS COULD HAVE BEEN USED FOR CHESS OR NOT. IF USING THIS SITE ON MOBILE YOU CAN SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK "VIEW WEB VERSION" TO SEE THE SIDEBAR FULL OF GOODIES.
Showing posts with label Corbyn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corbyn. Show all posts
Thursday, June 15, 2017
The UK And Australian Elections Weren't That Similar
Labels:
2016 federal,
Corbyn,
debunkings,
early elections,
federal,
Labor,
leaderships,
media coverage of politics,
netsats and 2PP,
poll failure,
pseph,
Rudd,
Shorten,
Theresa May,
Trump,
Turnbull,
UK 2017,
UK Labour
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)