Saturday, February 8, 2025

Prahran and Werribee By-Elections Live

Prahran (Grn vs Lib 12.0%)
Vacancy for resignation of Sam Hibbins (Grn/IND)
Liberal gain from Green/IND (called Sunday 4:20 pm)

Werribee (ALP vs Lib 10.9%)
Vacancy for resignation of Tim Pallas (ALP)
Labor still ahead after prepolls and appear on track to just retain despite a large swing
----

Sunday: Where The Lupton Vote Really Came From!

There has been some damage-control spinning from the Greens of a result that is simply very bad.  Among this has been a tweet by leader Ellen Sandell claiming that "Obviously it’s not the result we would have liked but with the unofficial Labor candidate sending their preferences to the Liberals, those Labor preferences have handed the seat to the Liberals this time."  Firstly, Lupton was not a typical unofficial "independent Labor" type candidate but one who'd got involved in some culture war issues and criticised the party.  Secondly, candidates don't send preferences anywhere (it's the lower house) and I'd be surprised if the follow rate for the Lupton card was that high anyway.  Thirdly the evidence is that where Lupton got his votes from tended not to be the ALP support base.  In booth terms, while his vote was pretty flat everywhere, he did worst in the good Labor booths from 2022 and better in the good Liberal booths from 2022 - even though the former had more votes up for grabs care of Labor not running!  Neither result is statistically significant but they do very strongly contradict the idea that the Lupton vote was a large chunk of the former Labor vote - it looks more like an independent conservative sort of thing:




Sunday Turnout Note: Currently the turnout is at 75.2% in Werribee and 64.3% in Prahran.  Both will climb by several percent on remaining postals and provisionals, but Prahran won't get near its 2022 turnout of 82.7% while Werribee could get within a few points of its 2022 rollup of 86.2%.  

Turnouts are nearly always down substantially in by-elections (especially for the time of year I think the Werribee turnout is good) but they are often especially so when one major party doesn't contest.  This is one of the factors: many rusted-on Labor supporters of the sort who are likely to follow how to vote cards may well not have turned up.  But the Greens have still either done badly off the remainder, or else done badly at retaining their own past voters (or both).  This has played into a shift in overall preference flow of a staggering 35.3 points in the Liberals' favour.  

4:20 pm The Greens have conceded defeat in Prahran - while there have been extremely rare cases of candidates conceding then winning (indeed the Greens very nearly won Northcote after conceding it), in this case we can safely assume they're not seeing anything in terms of big errors.

6:30am Sunday The 2PP for the Werribee prepolls did finally arrive and Labor only got 49.6% of preferences in them (compared to my model's 52%) but even so Labor leads by 441 (50.6-49.4) and should still just hang on as there will not be that many more postals.  However, certainly need to see rechecking here before calling this.   

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11:15 END OF SATURDAY COVERAGE WRAP The night isn't over while we wait for the final 2PP for Werribee but I'm expecting Labor to be in a comfortable position despite a large swing once it does go in.  Aside from the presumably impossible prospect of independent Paul Hopper beating either major by 50 points on preferences in a three-way split and thereby dislodging one or other from the final two, it looks like Labor will survive in Werribee without wild celebrations but with a relieved sigh.  Their primary vote has been absolutely hammered but little of that has gone to the Liberals.  

As for Prahran, there was a view about that a Brad Battin-led Liberal Party could not get near winning this inner-city seat from the Greens but it seems that was quite wrong and the Greens have been harshly punished for their former member's misdeeds.  Or something, as this result ties in with findings that while the Greens are travelling fine in polling generally, there is a cloud over their best inner-city areas; this could make them nervous for the federal election.    The killer in the Prahran count, assuming the Greens have indeed lost the seat, was the postals.  I'll update tomorrow night if there is anything more much to add.  

11:10 And actually more prepolls have now been added - Labor seems to be OK here as I the late added ones have been better than the early ones and the prepolls should do nothing much after preferences.  

11:05 I am now projecting Labor about 500 ahead after prepolls - there was an error in my previous calculation.  If it pans out like that they will probably be OK.  

10:34 Labor did well on preferences in the Manor Lakes booth and might now lead by 100-150 once the prepoll prefs are added.  

10:21 And yes the prepolls are all in to 2CP in Prahran and the Liberals are now 945 ahead.  I'll hold off pending confirmation of anything to come or rechcking for now but it appears very strongly that the Liberals have gained Prahran.  

10:18 A partial early vote preference count in Prahran but don't know which centre it is from or what the primaries are there - the VEC really needs to start breaking out individual PPVCs in its numbers.  Need to see the full prepoll preference count to confirm what appears to be the case here - that the Liberals are winning.

10:11 At least some prepolls are in in Werribee and they are bad for Labor!  The Liberals will gain 650 on primaries which I project may blow out to around 900 on preferences; on the plus side for Labor there is a Manor Lakes booth where they are gaining over 100 on primaries.  This projects to more or less a tie, with Labor probably a few to several dozen ahead, easily within the margin of rechecking errors.  

9:44 I was heavily distracted by the Prahran mystery and on checking Werribee it appears that Labor should retain it unless something very bad happens on prepolls - I project them at about 52.5-47.5 after preferences and remaining booths.  I have had a question raised about one booth which I am checking.  (Yes, Labor now at 52.7 in the live count.)  Caution still needed - a very large prepoll count coming.

9:30 As I expected the Liberals are now ahead in Prahran, 51.6-48.4, and would appear to be winning it with probably not much more to add tonight.    

9:25 I am continuing to be confused as to why other sites are projecting Prahran positively for the Greens.  On my numbers the Liberals are level on current primaries, projecting to stay there after remaining votes and getting more than half the preferences in the booths.  So why are they not ahead?

8:56 Prahran seems to have tightened a great deal - the postals were very good for Liberals who have now caught up on primaries, and the overall 2CP swing is running close to the target.  Preference flows are much weaker for the Greens so far than previous elections.  I am only tracking off three booths so far but the projection now is for a 13.9% 2CP swing which would be enough to give the Liberals the seat!  The difference between what I'm doing and other sites is that I am assuming the preference flow will vary by booth based on how good the booth is for the parties.  Other sites are assuming the flow seen in the booths so far will continue.  But those booths are good booths for the Greens on average.  

8:36 A very positive development for Labor in the Thomas Chirnside booth.  There the swing based off the major party primaries is 10.9% (in the overall count it is 10.8%) but the swing after preferences is only 7.8%.  

8:22 Huge dump of votes in Prahran.  There's a slight swing to Greens and Liberals on primaries which would project the Greens to lead on primaries 38-33, but we need to see some preference flows.  It seems unlikely the preferences would be enough to be a problem, even despite Lupton's how to vote card.  Clearly the Greens and Liberals are the 2CP.  Notably the Greens have done well on prepolls.

8:20 Another two booths are in in Werribee.  The majors are now roughly even on primaries on 28 each but this projects out to about a 31-27 lead to Liberals and then the question is whether the preference flow is enough to stay there.  Still waiting for more preference booths.  Postals are in in Werribee and these have a big primary vote swing to the Liberals.

8:10 First booth in Prahran is in, Orrong.  There's a 4% swing to the Liberals and 2.4% against the Greens, Lupton is in barely double figures.  A comfortable start for the Greens on primaries, but need to see the 2CP flow as preferences could be far weaker for the Greens with no Labor candidate.  There is also a very small number of early votes in.

8:04 Two more Werribee booths in, with slightly smaller swings against Labor, mostly again going to Hopper and Vic Soc, some to the right.  Labor now tracking for 26.2 which would probably be enough to hold off Hopper who is tracking for 12.4 (some Green votes especially always go to Labor).  The two-party swing is about 11% ignoring preferences (just off the primaries) so the question is if the preference flow stays weak as per Little River, which would be advantage Murphy.  

8:00 The Liberals in Werribee at this stage, even if they win the 2PP, look very vulnerable to any non-Labor candidate who might get into the top two.  But it's not yet clear if anyone can.  

7:50 Riverbend is in in Werribee - another 20% swing against Labor but this time it's all going to Hopper and Vic Soc both of whom are on 12%.  An even larger minor party vote in this one.  

7:34 We have a 2PP swing for Little River; it's slightly more than I expected at 16.3%, with more than half the preferences going to Liberals in a mostly left list of minor parties.  Small sample but that is very ominous. 

7:32 Slow count this, I've been gradually adding sentences to the post below but there's been nothing more to see yet.  

7:04 Game on in Werribee, a huge swing in the Little River booth with Labor down 23.5 points (losing more than half their primary vote!) and Liberals up 12.8.  This is a small booth on the edge of the seat and may be unrepresentative but we will see!  A lot of the swing is going to Victorian Socialists in that very small booth, that would mostly return to Labor as preferences, so the 2PP damage might be, say, 14%.  A 40% non-major vote is also interesting - probably won't keep up across the seat as a whole as we get into better booths for Labor.  But that said this booth hasn't in the past been that bad comparatively, especially on primary vote.  After one booth, I'm not yet sure Labor's making the top two!

7:03 Antony has also reported that in Prahran prepolls are down 4.1 points on 2022 while postals are up 1.6 so far (and more will come).  In Werribee both have more or less exactly matched 2022 - not bad numbers for by-elections! 

6:55 Still no booths - the number of candidates means the counts will not be that quick.

6:46 Antony Green notes "A further note on pre-polls and postals. They will be counted tonight but won't report until after 9pm. The VEC does not distinguish between pre-poll voting centres, and as there are two in each district, there will be two updates reported as a total against a sinbgle historical figure for 2022. The swing measured after on pre-poll may not be a reliable measure of the final swing after two centres report."

6:33 No figures yet. Simon Love on Sky has said that Labor operatives are managing expectations re Werribee, either saying that they may lose or that they think they'll hang on narrowly.  Sometimes when they say this it is true but always watch out for the Eeyore factor.

---

Intro (4:15 pm)

Welcome to my coverage of the Prahran and Werribee by-elections live.  My guide pages for these by-elections are here.  I will be posting comments about the counts through the evening starting from about 6:30 (or earlier if there's anything to say earlier).  Once counts start coming through, refresh every 10 mins or so for latest commentary.

There will be no coverage tomorrow (Sunday) until the evening - if there is anything to add anyway.  If there is any life left in the counts I will follow the post-counts through the coming week(s) until results are clear.  A summary will appear at the top of the page when there's anything to summarise and comments will appear in the space above.  If you want to donate to support my coverage of elections, there are donation options in the sidebar (if viewing on mobile phone, scroll to bottom of the page and click "View web version" to see the sidebar.)  

All numbers on this page are unofficial - visit the VEC site for official numbers.  All projections are also unofficial and I should not be considered to have "called" any seat until I explicitly use that word.  

Neither of these by-elections will change the overall state of the Victorian parliament but they are an important test for Labor, the Liberals and Greens ahead of the 2026 election.  Werribee is a classic case where a usually safe government seat could fall because it is a by-election and the government is polling badly.  There hasn't been any reliable polling for the seat and views on what will happen vary.  Prahran is weirder, but the Greens would want to hold it despite the negative circumstances of it being vacant, as this would boost their chance of winning it again in 2026.  

Tonight Werribee appears to be the more straightforward count.  It is generally expected to be a straight fight between Labor and Liberals where whoever wins the two-party preferred vote wins the seat.  There has been very little change to the booth listing though the Werribee and Werribee Central booths are merged.  There will be a large prepoll count to keep an eye on and population growth may impact the relative vote levels in different booths.

Prahran could be messier.  Firstly while this is on paper a Greens vs Liberals contest, there is more speculation that someone else (probably the independent Tony Lupton, a former Labor MP for the seat) can get into the top two, possibly from behind on preferences.  Prahran has also seen far greater changes in the booth listing, with only nine booths in use instead of fifteen.   This is especially significant in the south of the seat where the St Kilda, Balaclava and Redan Central booths will not be joining us (according to the VEC's booth locator) and those were all booths with Green 2CPs over 70%.  Most likely this will increase the vote in other southern booths.  But a further trick here is that since there is no Labor candidate there is no Labor how to vote.  All else equal, this is likely to mean the 2CP swing to the Liberals (assuming there is one) is stronger in the south where the Labor vote is higher (especially if any of the normally Labor-leaning voters pick up the Tony Lupton how to vote card, which recommends preferences to the Liberals ahead of the Greens, instead).  Perhaps the final two in Prahran will be obvious early, but maybe not.  (If the VEC happens to pick the wrong final two they won't realign the count tonight.)

By-elections have other quirks including a negligible absent vote, which sometimes allows conservative candidates to be competitive from well back at the end of the night.  The counting of some postals on the night should water down this effect but it may still be present.  

For those who can't get enough Victorian election content, the post below this one covers the Victorian government's disappointing failure to give even in principle support to scrapping group ticket voting for the upper house.  Tonight is, however, the lower house, where all preference flows are decided by the voter!

See also Poll Bludger results thread.

Friday, February 7, 2025

Victorian Labor Kicks The Group Ticket Can Down The Road

(Coverage of Victorian by-elections tonight from 6 pm.  Live page will go up around 5 pm).

Victoria is the last place in Australia where Group Ticket Voting persists in upper house elections.  The system was invented in the 1980s because the Democrats, who are to blame for everything, forced the Hawke Labor government to retain full preferencing in Senate elections.  Because requiring voters to number all the boxes for Senate elections often caused extremely high informal rates, Group Ticket Voting was created as a way to retain full preferencing while cutting the informal rate.  A voter could vote 1 for a party and their party would allocate their preference for them.

Initially this system lacked obvious downsides but its potential for exploitation was obvious as early as the 1987 federal election, where a Nuclear Disarmament candidate with 1.5% of the primary vote was elected.  A series of farcical GTV elections around the country since led to the abolition of the system in NSW, federally, SA and WA leaving only Victoria.  Problems exposed with the system have included:

* parties winning off tiny vote shares defeating much more popular parties when they would not win under any other system
* confusing and deceptive GTV preference allocations that are beyond the understanding of most voters if they tried to follow them
* preference harvesting in which ideologically unrelated parties band together to try to secure election off each others' group ticket preferences
* creation of unnecessary tipping points that should be irrelevant to the contest, making it easier for elections to be voided (eg WA Senate 2013)
* creation of bogus near-100% preference flows between parties when, if asked to choose preferences for themselves, voters spread preferences in a much less concentrated fashion
* corruption of parliamentary voting behaviour, in the form of party votes on electoral reform being influenced by fear of losing the ability to work with Glenn Druery, as stated by Druery himself in the Angry Victorians sting video
* denying voters the ability to direct their own preferences between parties above the line (which they will be used to doing so having done so twice since the last state election) and throwing away their stated preferences and overwrites them with a group ticket vote if they do. 
*confusion between the Victorian system and the Senate system

In over a decade in office the Victorian Labor government has continually dragged its heels on fixing group ticket voting.  And this week it has done it again!

In its excellent and impressively thorough report on the 2022 election the Electoral Matters committee recommended not only that group ticket voting be scrapped but that:

"Eliminating group voting tickets should occur independently of changes to the regions and must not be delayed in order to take place after or at the same time as changes to the regions.

The proposed changes involve serious and complex issues, with changes potentially having significant consequences for the make-up of Victoria’s Parliament. They may make it more difficult for smaller parties to be represented in the Upper House. Changes to the number of members and/or regions would compensate for this by lowering the quota for election.

While the Committee believes that the best outcome for Victoria would be the elimination of group voting tickets together with a change to the regions, the Committee considers that eliminating group voting tickets would be beneficial even without changes to the regions."  

(p. 61)

The issue here is that the Bracks Government foolishly used manner and form entrenchment to entrench a Legislative Council system of 8 regions with 5 members each into the Victorian Constitution, so a referendum is now needed to remove it.  This was despite the limits of 5-member seats for fair representation of minor parties already being on show in the 1998 Tasmanian election.  In the current environment, abolishing Group Ticket Voting without changing the regional structure is likely to over-represent the Greens while providing few seats for other minor parties, although there are many minor parties in Victoria with a few percent support that deserve a seat in a 40-member Council.

The recommendation above in italics was almost unanimous, supported by all Labor members of the committee and strongly by now Liberal leader Brad Battin in additional comments.  The only opposition was from Legalise Cannabis MLC David Ettershank who while supporting abolishing GTV also wanted the abolition linked to reform of the regions to avoid a situation where non-Green minor parties probably won very few seats.

Ettershank is not in the Council to muck around and has flagged on his core issue that he will start blocking unrelated legislation in the absence of cannabis reform.  Perhaps Labor was reluctant to endorse the bit in italics for fear of invoking a similar response, but if so they could have at least announced in-principle support for scrapping GTV in 2030 subject to (or better, following but irrespective of) a 2026 referendum on whatever structure best resolved the minor-party issue.  Personally, while I would greatly prefer GTV to be scrapped for 2026 I would accept it if a deal was passed to make sure 2026 was the last GTV election.  

By deferring any response until after the Legislative Council structure review has concluded in December, the government may well have guaranteed that there will be no reform this term and that a referendum on a new structure is the best case for this term.  The government presumably won't be passing legislation in December and legislation passed in February would leave the Victorian Electoral Commission with a risky eight-month lead-in to implement a new system.  But the Government's failure to even announce any kind of in-principle support for scrapping Group Ticket voting suggests they are scared not of Ettershank but Druery.  This is their response:

"Further consideration required The EMC is undertaking its Inquiry into Victoria’s Upper House electoral system and is due to report by 8 December 2025. The government will await the findings of this Inquiry before forming a view on this recommendation."

This government has had ten years in office to form at least an in-principle view, based on abundant evidence, that Group Ticket Voting needs to go in the bin.  How long can it take?  In the absence of even in-principle or conditional support - with nothing but more stalling - there is no basis for faith that Labor will do anything about the issue at all.  Even if they do allow a referendum on the structure, they could sabotage the referendum and then use its failure as a reason to say no to scrapping Group Tickets - if, that is, they're still in office.

This copout isn't an isolated case.  Another issue raised in the Electoral Matters report was the need to replace the Inclusive Gregory method for surplus transfers with Weighted Inclusive Gregory.  Inclusive Gregory is a flaw left over from the paper-counting days in which votes included in a surplus all continue on at the same new value as each other irrespective of the value they had going in.  In the computer age, continuing to distort the values of votes by using Inclusive Gregory is simply not justifiable whether one has Group Ticket Voting or not and however many regions with however many members one has.  It's just a no-brainer to eliminate an unfair feature from the count.  So what is the response?

"Further consideration required The EMC is undertaking its Inquiry into Victoria’s Upper House electoral system and is due to report by 8 December 2025. The government will await the findings of this Inquiry before forming a view on this recommendation."

Sigh.  The call for submissions by Electoral Matters explicitly states "We're not seeking views on [..] how votes should be counted" - the inquiry is all about the structure of a presumably post-GTV system.

----------------------------------------------------------------

As for the current inquiry, submissions have not yet been posted, but a quick summary of mine.  The discussion paper canvassed six alternative possible structures for the Legislative Council:

* 40 member single electorate all in all out
* 20 member electorate half in half out
* 4 x 10 member regions
* 7 x 7 member regions
* 8 x 5 member regions with topup seats for underrepresented parties
* 25 member urban region with 3x5 rural/regional regions

I most liked the 4-region system followed by the 40 member single electorate (the latter has some disadvantages including election off very low vote shares and potential ballot structure impact on that).  However, I found that 4x11 appeared superior to 4x10 in terms of both minor party representation and a workable Council for governments.  I disliked 2x20 (including because eight years is just too long, and also because of the risks of obstruction), 7x7 (because it is little different to 8x5), the topup proposal (because primary vote threshholds are arbitrary and may be manipulated), and 25+3x5 (rural/regional voters would have a substantially inferior representation experience.)  

See also: