Rosevears: Palmer (LIB) defeated Finlay (IND) by 260 votes.
Donations welcome!
If you find my coverage useful please consider donating to support the large amount of time I spend working on this site. Donations can be made by the Paypal button in the sidebar or email me via the address in my profile for my account details. Especially in these uncertain times, please only donate if you are sure you can afford to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live comments (scrolls to top)
All updates are unofficial, check the TEC site for official figures
Wrap: Well that was a rollercoaster with some rather weird preference flows, the independence of the Upper House dying hard in the strong flows to Finlay off Gale and (given his conservatism) Fry, but then not so much as enough Labor preferences went to Palmer to save her just when that was looking unlikely. Another very near miss for Janie Finlay who would have beaten any other candidate. In Huon, Bastian Seidel has enjoyed a massive victory that will boost Labor's stocks greatly.
Thanks all for the interest in the coverage; it's been a long road but these were fascinating contests. In 2021 we have Windermere, where three-term incumbent Ivan Dean is widely expected to retire but hasn't committed either way in public. We have Labor's safe seat of Derwent, where President Craig Farrell attracted only token opposition and won big in 2015, and also Mike Gaffney's seat of Mersey (ditto).
6:10: Seidel has won 57.3-42.7. The scrutineering figures sent to me on the night were of the highest quality and enabled me to project a big win for him on the night. The preferences of Harriss flowed around 2-1 to Armstrong but he was way too far behind.
With the election of Palmer, I note some gender records. The number of women in the Council rises to an all-time high of nine (60%); only 22 women have served in the chamber in history, including these nine. Worryingly for the embattled males, half of the remaining six are up for election next year. The number of males in the two houses combined drops to an all time low of 15, but this will return to 16 next week.
4:15: The TEC has confirmed Seidel is the winner. Presumably based on a partial distribution.
3:15: PALMER BY 260. Not close enough for a recount I would think. The closest LegCo margin since Lin Thorp won Rumney by 65 votes in 1999. The flow of preferences ex Greene was 72.28% to Finlay, 24.24% to Palmer, and the rest to exhaust. Preference flow is often weak in these elections in the absence of HTV cards.
2:40: Seidel has received 69% of Caruana's preferences and is still 2% from crossing the line, which he will easily do on the Harriss exclusion.
1:15: Now even Fry's preferences have split to Finlay! (Albeit only slightly). So it comes to this: Greene has 14.36% to throw and Palmer leads by 8.04%. Assuming zero exhaust, Finlay needs 78% of Greene's votes to win. In neighbouring Launceston in 2011 Labor preferences split 72.4% to Rosemary Armitage, but those were preferences of a male Labor candidate flowing to a female Independent against a male Liberal; in this case everyone involved is female.
12:50: Debbie Armstrong excluded in Huon and as expected about 40% of her flow went to Robert Armstrong. Caruana is next out and holds 19.18% with Seidel having 15.31% to go. If Seidel gets 79.8% of the Caruana preferences the election is over immediately and we do not get a 2-candidate result. Probably he will fall just short of this.
12:09: Davenport throw done in Rosevears and these split Finlay 631 Fry 240 Greene 784 Palmer 139, so only 7.7% went direct to Palmer. Much of the leftiness of these votes is probably bottled up in those that went to Greene, many of which will eventually go to Finlay. So for now Palmer leads by 8.29% with 10.14% from Fry and 12.92% from Greene to go, and needs .3595 votes per vote (around 68-32, maybe a bit higher allowing for exhaust) of the rest. The relatively high flow from Davenport to Fry has actually improved the percentage that Palmer needs off Fry to 54% if the Labor votes split 85-15, but has also diluted the Fry pool with these Davenport-Fry votes that presumably won't help Palmer much.
12:05: The first throw in Huon, of the Shooters' Garrick Cameron's preferences, slightly favoured Armstrong and Harris over Seidel. Seidel leads by 12.37% with 46.25% to throw, but that includes the extremely favourable Green preferences. I expect Debbie Armstrong's preferences to be quite good for Robert Armstrong because of the family connection, and then will come the Caruana throw, as Harriss has now moved into third.
11:16: Split of Gale's preferences: Davenport 81 Finlay 302 Fry 171 Greene 95 Palmer 112. That's a very strong start for Finlay! Gap closes to 10.44% with 26.44% to throw. That bring's Finlay's required gain rate down slightly to .3949 votes per vote, still needing about 70% flow, but also increases the proportion of the remainder that is Green and Labor votes. I have no scrutineering data on Rosevears but have to think Finlay's chances have just gone up considerably. Notably if she now gets 85% of Labor and Green preferences, Palmer will need the Fry votes to flow to her something like 60:40 to win.
Next up is Davenport (Greens) but David Fry after him will be the big one.
11:15: Primary count also done in Huon where Seidel leads by 12.54%.
Tuesday 11:00: Primaries are finished in Rosevears and Palmer's starting lead over Finlay is 11.28% with 28.24% to throw. Finlay must gain at .3995 votes per vote to win, which is the equivalent of a 70-30 flow assuming no exhaust. In practice with a few percent exhaust, the asking rate will be just over 70% of those thrown. First to go will be Vivienne Gale whose preferences are quite hard to predict.
Tuesday 11th Aug 10:40: Today's the day; postals closed at 10 am. I am not scrutineering and don't have word about the exact timing of the preference distributions but if last year is any guide final primaries will be up soon and then the distributions will commence. I expect they'd take most of the day.
Wednesday Huon postals have been updated, narrowing the gap by a further 0.05%. Turnout has now reached 85.08% in Huon (cf 85.17% in 2014) and 84.12% in Rosevears (cf 81.32%). Increased candidate numbers are probably a factor in Rosevears. At the least, the pandemic has not negatively affected turnout.
Tuesday 4:00 Rosevears postals have been added and rechecks completed and whatever slim hope Finlay may or may not have has increased slightly with the gap closing from 11.4% to 11.24%. The TEC also informs me that about 700 postals will be counted in Huon tomorrow. For Rosevears, 10542 of a possible 11416 postals have now arrived, but several will never arrive because they won't have been sent in the first place.
Tuesday 12:30 Finlay in interview here (starts 1:10:45) has described winning as "possible but super unlikely"; based on comments from her scrutineers it seems she is expecting to close the gap on preferences (this is also my expectation) but probably not by enough. I have also now seen a Liberal press release that was "cautiously optimistic" Palmer would win.
Tuesday 10:40: TEC have informed me that about 800 postals will be counted in Rosevears with results uploaded late this afternoon. This probably won't resolve the matter but it may push the needle one way or the other.
Monday 6:30: A trivial number of out-of-division and provisional votes were added today doing nothing to the gap in Rosevears and taking 0.02% of Seidel's lead in Huon. No further action is expected til next Tuesday and absent of detailed scrutineering figures I won't be calling Rosevears in the meantime.
Monday 9:30 am: While we wait for more numbers, or any useful indication re Rosevears, I should note the preference flow at last year's Nelson election. When Vica Bayley (left-wing independent) was excluded, 76% of his votes went to Meg Webb (ditto) with 11.8% going to Nic Street (Liberal) and 12.2% exhausting. The exhaust rate in this case will be much lower, maybe something like 2%. Of preferences that did flow, Webb got 86.6%. This sort of flow is why, if there turns out to be no net flow from David Fry to Palmer, it might (for all I know) be still just possible for Finlay to get there on the Labor and Greens preferences. Especially if she might benefit from the few votes remaining to be counted (some of those expected today) or from any corrections in checking. That said I am sceptical that the flow to Palmer will be quite as weak as the flow to Street.
Sunday 5pm: Labor has publicly claimed victory in Huon following the postals.
Sunday 2pm: The second lot of postals is in for Huon and whereas the first lot was favourable for Armstrong and unfavourable for Caruana, this lot have actually helped Seidel extend his lead to 12.6%, with Caruana remaining in third. Meanwhile in Rosevears the second lot of postals have boosted Palmer's lead to 11.4%. Finlay would now need 85% of Greens and Labor preferences if no votes exhausted and the Fry and Gale votes split evenly - this is verging on impossible, but maybe the few votes to be counted on Monday will bring the asking rate down just a little.
1 am Huon called I have been sent some very detailed scrutineering samples from Huon that include a sample of around 450 preferences from the candidates who will be excluded, assuming that Robert Armstrong finishes second. These come from a range of booths including prepoll. The overwhelming feature is that 70% of Caruana's votes go direct to Seidel. The rest includes some friendly flows for Armstrong but also a heck of a lot of splatter. I have crunched these via a couple of methods and these project Seidel with a final result of around 58-59% 2CP (ie his lead increases) even after accounting for expected dropoff in the Green vote. Note that about 19% of the vote does not reach either Seidel or Armstrong by #2 in this sample but Seidel has enough that he needs virtually none of that. The projection could turn out to be generous but the sample would need to have several standard deviations of error to make a difference. It is now clear to me that Seidel will win so this seat has been called. Labor wins Huon for the first time since 1942.
6 pm: TEC results pages are up - Huon Rosevears. Nothing to see yet on either. Note for anyone doing booth matching that quite a lot of small booths are not being used at this election. Rosevears in particular has only 13 booths. The TEC does not separate prepolls by division in the public figures. There are no mobile booths or Agfest booths this election.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intro (Saturday 1 pm)
Finally we are here! Welcome to my live and post-count coverage of the repeatedly delayed Huon and Rosevears Legislative Council elections. You can see my seat previews here:
Huon
Rosevears
and also my latest assessment of voting patterns in the Legislative Council. It's been a long and winding road of delays and process changes to get to that point (which I wrote about here and here) but finally the votes have all been cast (probably more than half of them before the day) and we are ready to see some actual numbers.
The left-wing majority in the Legislative Council isn't on the line tonight, though the independent majority is; wins for party candidates in both seats would see more than half the Council in party hands for the first time ever. However that is considered fairly unlikely. The elections are significant for the balance of the Council, which will become closer if retiring incumbent Kerry Finch is replaced by a right-wing candidate in Rosevears, or less close if Robert Armstrong is defeated by the left in Huon. (Or both these things could in theory happen and they could cancel out, though that seems even more unlikely.)
Beyond that, the more significant seat is Rosevears as a test for how the government is travelling. We know that the Premier, Peter Gutwein, is extremely popular, but we don't know to what extent, if any, this translates to voting intention. Complicating the assessment, the Liberal candidate Jo Palmer has a very high profile in Rosevears and was expected to win anyway. Palmer however has a significant opponent in high-profile independent Launceston councillor Janie Finlay. An easy win for the Liberals will fuel the now widespread speculation of an early state election, while a defeat or an inconclusive win might put it to bed for good.
Labor also faces significant tests tonight, and a difficult challenge in holding its vote at a reasonable level given competition from independents and the strength of the Green vote in Huon. The party seems to be struggling greatly for both oxygen and coherence as the government's response to COVID-19 dominates everything and would want to at least make the final two in one of tonight's contests.
How this works
Comments will start soon after 6 pm (slowly at first around dinner!) and will go through til counting finishes (usually about 9-ish but I suspect later tonight) with a wrapup posted sometime after that. Refresh frequently after 6:30-ish to see the most recent comments - at the height of counting on average there will probably be a new comment every 5-10 minutes or so.
Comments will continue over coming days as the post-counting unfolds. The level of comments will probably depend on how close the seats are.
The count will be unusual, with turnouts way down in the booths and a very high rate of postal voting. Almost 10000 postals have been taken in each seat, as well as significant numbers of prepolls.
The TEC aims to count all within-division prepolls tonight. As concerns postals, they aim to count 5000 in each division tonight and the remainder on hand (approx 4750 Rosevears and 4500 Huon) tomorrow with figures in the afternoon. Remaining postals (probably only a few hundred in my view) will be counted on Tuesday August 11. Provisionals and out-of-divisions will be counted on Monday Aug 3.
I expect both seats to go to preferences given the strength of the fields. However, whether they do so as live contests or as foregone conclusions remains to be seen. Preferences will not be counted tonight, and if there is a close race it may not be resolved until around August 11-12.
When I consider there is no realistic doubt about the fate of a seat the magic word CALLED will appear in the header. Until then it will contain a brief summary of how the count is going in each seat, which may at times be out of date.
Early in the night I'll be trying to do some rough projections for each seat, but as the numbers settle down I'll largely stop doing this. Especially it will be hard to predict how the postals will match the booth votes (one would think more closely than usual). Once the first lot of postals are counted it should be possible to project final primaries by assuming they will be similar - but there might be some time-based differences that mean there are differences.
The following projections will be attempted:
* In Huon, I will be projecting the Labor and Green votes off the 2018 state election. I will be running two projections for Robert Armstrong, one off his vote at the 2014 Huon election, and one off the Liberal vote at the 2018 state election. I expect the former to be inaccurate as he was competing against the Liberals and the 2014 election had a lot of variation in voting patterns based on where different candidates live.
* In Rosevears, I will be projecting the Labor and Green votes off the 2018 state election. I will be running two projections for Jo Palmer, one off the Liberal vote in Rosevears 2014 and one off the Liberal state vote in 2018. I will also project David Fry off the latter but will only report those numbers if he is doing well. I will be projecting Janie Finlay off Kerry Finch's vote in Rosevears 2014 (I don't expect that to be very accurate). For the Finlay projection for new booths I will be using a regression of the Finch vote off the 2014 state results.
If the second half of postals are as bad for the Greens as the first half, Caruana will fall back to fourth. I'd thought postals might have been better for the Greens with a bigger cross section of the community voting that way, but I guess not.
ReplyDeleteO'Connor will deliver a catastrophic vote for the Greens if she remains leader at the next state election. I don't sense energy, constructive positive policies to inspire, no sense of direction or even purpose. Those problems from the top have fed into these results. Some people are natural leaders and some are not. I really think you need a clear sense of purpose and connection with the people if you want to be successful leading a party like the Greens. Here's a plan: O'Connor makes the wise decision to resign from parliament 6 months before the next election. A lower candidate takes her place on count back so Burnett can stay on Council. Vica Bailey announces intention to run and is endorsed as lead candidate for Clark ticket. Bailey to lead the Greens from outside the parliament in the lead up to the election. Maybe this injection of change and style could save the Tasmanian Greens from oblivion in 2022.
DeleteI don't think O'Connor standing down is likely. I'd say it's more likely that Woodruff loses her top spot on tge ticket to Caruana.
Delete