The outcome in WA has been on the cards for years, and the fact that the Barnett government lost breaks no new ground by itself. Defeat could be predicted as probable based on a combination of what I call federal drag (being of the same party as in power federally), the age of the state government, and the federal government's poor polling. Indeed even Colin Barnett's poor personal ratings alone suggested he was already likely to lose this election less than a year out from his very strong 2013 result. There's a strong case that Barnett should have been removed at least a year ago. Those who failed to do so look quite silly now, but they are geniuses compared to those who wanted to replace Mark McGowan with someone not even in the parliament because McGowan was thought to be too boring to win the election!
ELECTORAL, POLLING AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS, COMMENT AND NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CLARK. LET 2026 BE THE YEAR VICTORIA IS FINALLY FREED OF THE CURSE OF GROUP TICKET VOTING. IF USING THIS SITE ON MOBILE YOU CAN SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK "VIEW WEB VERSION" TO SEE THE SIDEBAR FULL OF GOODIES.
Thursday, March 16, 2017
WA Washup: Another One Bites The Dust
It's a familiar script. Five conservative state and territory governments have sought re-election since the Coalition took power federally and only one of the five (NSW) has survived. Western Australia joins Queensland, the Northern Territory and (less emphatically) Victoria as jurisdictions where Coalition incumbents have been given the boot in the last few years.
Monday, March 6, 2017
EMRS: Liberals Crash, But Hodgman Still Clobbering Green
EMRS Feb 2017: Lib 35 ALP 29 Greens 19 Ind/Other 11 One Nation 6
On these numbers a hung parliament would be inevitable (approx 11 Liberal, 10 Labor, 4 Green, though one more Liberal seat might fall to One Nation or the Greens)
EMRS Nov 2016: Lib 40 ALP 28 Green 18 Ind/Other 13 (One Nation not in readout)
On these numbers most likely result would have been a hung parliament (approx 12 Liberal, 10 Labor, 3 Green)
Current seat aggregate of all polls: Lib 12 ALP 10 Greens 3
Note: EMRS tends to skew to Greens and Others and against ALP. No evidence on skew for or against One Nation is known.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again, Tasmanian phone pollster EMRS has released two of its quarterly polls, for November and February, in a single release. See also the trend tracker, which shows that the Liberal vote has been falling for four years now.
For the first time, One Nation has been included in the readout, and immediately the Hodgman Government has lost five points to 35%, its worst position of the term. Even the Roy Morgan series, which was obviously skewed against the Government (and hasn't been seen since October) never had it below 37.
On these numbers a hung parliament would be inevitable (approx 11 Liberal, 10 Labor, 4 Green, though one more Liberal seat might fall to One Nation or the Greens)
EMRS Nov 2016: Lib 40 ALP 28 Green 18 Ind/Other 13 (One Nation not in readout)
On these numbers most likely result would have been a hung parliament (approx 12 Liberal, 10 Labor, 3 Green)
Current seat aggregate of all polls: Lib 12 ALP 10 Greens 3
Note: EMRS tends to skew to Greens and Others and against ALP. No evidence on skew for or against One Nation is known.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again, Tasmanian phone pollster EMRS has released two of its quarterly polls, for November and February, in a single release. See also the trend tracker, which shows that the Liberal vote has been falling for four years now.
For the first time, One Nation has been included in the readout, and immediately the Hodgman Government has lost five points to 35%, its worst position of the term. Even the Roy Morgan series, which was obviously skewed against the Government (and hasn't been seen since October) never had it below 37.
Patchy Polling In WA As The Final Week Begins
Going into the final week of the WA campaign, not much has changed from where it started a month ago. The relatively scant and yet surprisingly diverse nature of polling data available leaves poll-watchers free to choose their own adventure, from a comprehensive win for Mark McGowan's Labor opposition to a very close and messy race in which Colin Barnett's Liberals might even cling on in minority by the skin of their teeth. About the only thing the statewide polls agree on is this: following a shambolic and confused campaign, One Nation may have tanked.
The following table gives all the statewide polling known to me. The poll marked as "Essential" is known to me only from a Poll Bludger exclusive that describes it as Greens-commissioned Essential robopoll. That description places it at least two degrees of separation from anything we can place verified trust in but I mention it all the same. I've also given an average and a time-weighted (but not performance-weighted) aggregate, in each case excluding the Essential.
In this case though, I don't place that much confidence in aggregation methods. There is a major house-effect difference between the ReachTELs and the Galaxy/Newspoll stable, worth at least four points on each major party's primaries, and coming out at two or three on the 2PP only because ReachTEL use respondent preferences (which have been skewing massively to Labor). There's a pretty good chance here that someone's right and someone's wrong. We're not just seeing margin of error issues here - there would not be such large and consistent differences in the major party primaries by pollster if we were. (And no, voting intention doesn't bounce around this much in reality through a campaign either.)
The following table gives all the statewide polling known to me. The poll marked as "Essential" is known to me only from a Poll Bludger exclusive that describes it as Greens-commissioned Essential robopoll. That description places it at least two degrees of separation from anything we can place verified trust in but I mention it all the same. I've also given an average and a time-weighted (but not performance-weighted) aggregate, in each case excluding the Essential.
In this case though, I don't place that much confidence in aggregation methods. There is a major house-effect difference between the ReachTELs and the Galaxy/Newspoll stable, worth at least four points on each major party's primaries, and coming out at two or three on the 2PP only because ReachTEL use respondent preferences (which have been skewing massively to Labor). There's a pretty good chance here that someone's right and someone's wrong. We're not just seeing margin of error issues here - there would not be such large and consistent differences in the major party primaries by pollster if we were. (And no, voting intention doesn't bounce around this much in reality through a campaign either.)
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Groundhog Day: Group Ticket Nonsense Returns To WA
Glenn Druery will not say exactly what he's been paid to help micro-parties use preference-harvesting to win Upper House seats they don't deserve at the WA State Election. If it was only $5,000 per party plus a $50K win bonus as claimed (and denied), then his services have come pretty cheap. The game is the same as it ever was: to give parties with very little support a chance at winning they don't deserve, by exploiting inflexible voting systems to create preference flows that have nothing to do with the intention of voters. Druery trollishly describes this as an "outbreak of democracy". I will bet that he can scarcely believe his luck to still be in this business.
After the debacle that was the 2013 Senate election in WA, one would have thought WA would be the last place on earth that would let Druery still ply his trade. Alas, it looks like it will instead be the last place on earth that ever stops him. It was in WA in 2013 that Wayne Dropulich of the Australian Sports Party (whatever that was) surfed from 0.2% of the vote to a Senate seat as a result of preference-harvesting, only for his election to be annulled because the loss of some ballot papers caused an irrelevant tipping point to become irresolvable. (This, in turn, was a product of the group ticket system.) And it was then WA where the whole state's Senate election had to be rerun from scratch in 2014 at immense cost.
It seems quite a damning indictment on the Barnett government that it has had three and a half years since the 2013 debacle to clean up the state's similar Legislative Council voting system and hasn't even introduced a bill to that effect. By comparison, the model being considered in South Australia is pretty bad, but at least South Australia's government is trying. Whether WA's has just had too many other problems to care about democracy, or else has kept the system to deliberately salt the earth for its successor, I don't know.
WA's upper house has the worst state electoral system in the nation. It is badly malapportioned in favour of rural electorates, it has Group Ticket voting, and it has a ridiculous lack of savings provisions for votes that stray off the narrow path of exact formality. What we will see in the WA Upper House next weekend is barely even fit to be considered an election.
After the debacle that was the 2013 Senate election in WA, one would have thought WA would be the last place on earth that would let Druery still ply his trade. Alas, it looks like it will instead be the last place on earth that ever stops him. It was in WA in 2013 that Wayne Dropulich of the Australian Sports Party (whatever that was) surfed from 0.2% of the vote to a Senate seat as a result of preference-harvesting, only for his election to be annulled because the loss of some ballot papers caused an irrelevant tipping point to become irresolvable. (This, in turn, was a product of the group ticket system.) And it was then WA where the whole state's Senate election had to be rerun from scratch in 2014 at immense cost.
It seems quite a damning indictment on the Barnett government that it has had three and a half years since the 2013 debacle to clean up the state's similar Legislative Council voting system and hasn't even introduced a bill to that effect. By comparison, the model being considered in South Australia is pretty bad, but at least South Australia's government is trying. Whether WA's has just had too many other problems to care about democracy, or else has kept the system to deliberately salt the earth for its successor, I don't know.
WA's upper house has the worst state electoral system in the nation. It is badly malapportioned in favour of rural electorates, it has Group Ticket voting, and it has a ridiculous lack of savings provisions for votes that stray off the narrow path of exact formality. What we will see in the WA Upper House next weekend is barely even fit to be considered an election.
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Poll Roundup: One Nation Soars As Liberals Squabble
2PP Aggregate: 53.8 (+1) to ALP
Labor would easily win election "held now"
Coalition's worst position of the current term so far
On current polling One Nation could win at least three lower house seats
Normally I go a couple of Newspolls between poll roundups these days, but this week's has been one of those Newspolls. Following a conveniently timed "Newspoll bomb" by former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, the Turnbull government has recorded a new worst set of figures, and leadership speculation is rife. This comes on top of a Fair Work Commission decision to cut penalty rates, which is seen as bad news for the government although the process was set in train and, until its outcome, supported by Labor.
We are still getting very little federal polling apart from the weekly Essential readings and the slightly less than fortnightly Newspolls. The latest Newspoll came in at 55-45 to Labor, the highest reading for the Opposition since March 2015. (In total during the Abbott Prime Ministership Labor recorded four 55s and one 57.) I've aggregated it at 54.8 after processing the primaries. The last few Essentials were more restrained (typically for Essential) at 52, 52 and 53 for Labor, which I aggregated at 52.4, 52,2 and 53.0. Overall, largely on the back of the recent Newspoll, my aggregate has for now gone to 53.8% in Labor's favour. This is the first time in this term that it has exceeded the 53.6 at which Tony Abbott was disposed of in the term before.
Labor would easily win election "held now"
Coalition's worst position of the current term so far
On current polling One Nation could win at least three lower house seats
Normally I go a couple of Newspolls between poll roundups these days, but this week's has been one of those Newspolls. Following a conveniently timed "Newspoll bomb" by former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, the Turnbull government has recorded a new worst set of figures, and leadership speculation is rife. This comes on top of a Fair Work Commission decision to cut penalty rates, which is seen as bad news for the government although the process was set in train and, until its outcome, supported by Labor.
We are still getting very little federal polling apart from the weekly Essential readings and the slightly less than fortnightly Newspolls. The latest Newspoll came in at 55-45 to Labor, the highest reading for the Opposition since March 2015. (In total during the Abbott Prime Ministership Labor recorded four 55s and one 57.) I've aggregated it at 54.8 after processing the primaries. The last few Essentials were more restrained (typically for Essential) at 52, 52 and 53 for Labor, which I aggregated at 52.4, 52,2 and 53.0. Overall, largely on the back of the recent Newspoll, my aggregate has for now gone to 53.8% in Labor's favour. This is the first time in this term that it has exceeded the 53.6 at which Tony Abbott was disposed of in the term before.
Sunday, February 19, 2017
Not-A-Poll Results: Best And Worst Tasmanian Ministers
For amusement and interest, in the last couple of months I have been running two reader Not-A-Polls in the sidebar concerning Tasmania's current Liberal ministry. As the usual disclaimer goes, these not-a-polls are completely unscientific and represent only the opinions of those site readers (or random ring-ins) who may have chosen to participate. Polldaddy has more advanced protections against multiple voting than the native polls on the Blogger site that I used to use, but I suspect they could be routed around if anyone was truly determined. Also, this kind of exercise is especially prone to a word-of-mouth stack, where someone tells a bunch of their friends who would not normally read this site to vote on it.
Indeed there seemed to be something of that sort going on in the final week when there were sudden large gains for both Will Hodgman as best and Guy Barnett as worst.
Anyway, the following are the results for the Best Minister poll (in order), the Worst Minister poll (in reverse order) and a final ranking based on net scores (best minus worst) with position difference (best minus worst, 9 points for best on each scale to 1 for worst) used as a tiebreaker. Had I used position difference to rank the results with net scores as the tiebreaker, the final order would have been the same.
Indeed there seemed to be something of that sort going on in the final week when there were sudden large gains for both Will Hodgman as best and Guy Barnett as worst.
Anyway, the following are the results for the Best Minister poll (in order), the Worst Minister poll (in reverse order) and a final ranking based on net scores (best minus worst) with position difference (best minus worst, 9 points for best on each scale to 1 for worst) used as a tiebreaker. Had I used position difference to rank the results with net scores as the tiebreaker, the final order would have been the same.
Saturday, February 11, 2017
Queensland Galaxy Says Game On For PHON Balance Of Power
Queensland Galaxy: Labor 31 LNP 33 PHON 23 Green 8 KAP 3 Other 2
A Queensland state poll by Galaxy, published in the Courier-Mail, tells a story that should have both major parties quite concerned. If this poll is correct and typical, it is 1998 all over again and a bit more. Perhaps the current One Nation polling bubble will burst before an election that is possibly still most of a year away. If it doesn't, then a weakened minority government facing an unpopular opposition presents a dream scenario for Australia's number one nineties nostalgia party to break through at state level and obtain some serious power there. Whether it would manage to remain remotely united this time if it did, nobody knows.
The high One Nation vote should be considered no surprise following polls showing the party at 16% in Western Australia, 16.3% in NSW and 9.4% in Victoria. Queensland always was the party's strongest state. It's possible even that the figure is an underestimate, but I am not that convinced that One Nation voters are all that shy anymore.
Sample size issues aside (and I haven't seen the sample size for this poll yet) there is one big reason to treat this poll with unusual caution. It comes during a lousy news cycle for the government following the resignation of Transport Minister Stirling Hinchcliffe in response to a damning report on the failings of Queensland Rail. I would expect that event to be deflating Labor's primary vote, and everything I say below should be taken with that caveat.
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Sir David's Snail Is Not A New Species
![]() |
| Yes and no! |
Sometime in the late 19th century, pioneering Tasmanian land snail expert William Frederick Petterd collected some snail specimens near Eaglehawk Neck. Doubtless noting that some of them were much larger than a species considered widespread through the state, Petterd left an enigmatic (and for me at least illegible) note with the specimens, but did nothing further with them. Live specimens of the snail were first collected in the early 1970s resulting in the description of the new species Helicarion rubicundus by Dartnall and Kershaw in 1978. At the time this was treated as a fresh discovery of a new species, Petterd's earlier specimens having not been noticed.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017
Poll Roundup: Feeble In February
2PP Aggregate: 53.5 to Labor (+1.1 since last 2016 reading)
Labor would comfortably win an election "held now"
It is one of nature's most amazing seasonal events. As wildebeest migrate in vast numbers, as salmon throw themselves up rivers then spawn and die, so each February on the continent of Australia, a federal government disintegrates. At least it seems this way, with polling for the incumbent government of the time having gone pearshape around this time in six of the last seven years. Usually the causes for the downturn have been extremely obvious.
In the longer term this hasn't been such a thing, with average 2PP polling in February since 1986 (49.4% for the government) being only a point worse than those polls taken in January (50.4%) and no worse than polls taken in June and September. But just in recent years there is something about the annual reopening of Parliament that tends to bring with it the smell of chaos. What is happening with the current government is not (yet) as bad as the Week From Hell experienced by the Gillard government in 2013, but yet again we find a government under assault on multiple issues at once.
Labor would comfortably win an election "held now"
It is one of nature's most amazing seasonal events. As wildebeest migrate in vast numbers, as salmon throw themselves up rivers then spawn and die, so each February on the continent of Australia, a federal government disintegrates. At least it seems this way, with polling for the incumbent government of the time having gone pearshape around this time in six of the last seven years. Usually the causes for the downturn have been extremely obvious.
In the longer term this hasn't been such a thing, with average 2PP polling in February since 1986 (49.4% for the government) being only a point worse than those polls taken in January (50.4%) and no worse than polls taken in June and September. But just in recent years there is something about the annual reopening of Parliament that tends to bring with it the smell of chaos. What is happening with the current government is not (yet) as bad as the Week From Hell experienced by the Gillard government in 2013, but yet again we find a government under assault on multiple issues at once.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

