Saturday, May 4, 2024

Legislative Council 2024: Elwick, Hobart and Prosser Live

Elwick: Thomas (IND) has won c. 53.3-46.7 after preferences

Hobart: CALLED 9:01 pm Cassy O'Connor (GRN) wins

Prosser: Kerry Vincent (Lib) has won c. 52.9-47.1 after preferences

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donations welcome!

If you find my coverage useful please consider donating to support the large amount of time I spend working on this site.  Donations can be made by the Paypal button in the sidebar or email me via the address in my profile for my account details.  Please only donate if you are sure you can afford to do so.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Live comments (scrolls to top)

All numbers posted here are unofficial.  Check the TEC site for current figures.  Comments will appear here once counting starts - refresh every 10 mins or so for updates.  Note that Green in Prosser is Bryan Green the Labor candidate not the Greens.

--

Final Wrapup And The Road Ahead

It's all over bar a trivial number of votes to be added in the next week and these are the party standings in the new Legislative Council with the seat changes compared to the start of the year:

Liberal 4 (unchanged)

Labor 3 (-1) - currently includes President, who normally doesn't vote

Greens 1 (+1)

IND 7 (unchanged)

The makeup of the INDs (based on my voting patterns analysis) is left 2 (-1) centre 1 (=) centre-right 3 (=) and Bec Thomas is orientation TBD (+1).  It will be interesting to see how she votes but I doubt her voting will be that polarised either way; she has described herself as moderate and centrist.  Note that the existing centre IND is Ruth Forrest who I had as left throughout the 2010s but has been better described as centre based on votes since 2019.  On any issues on which the government has all three centre-right INDs onside it will currently have the numbers to block with that alone, or to pass motions with Labor or any one of Thomas, Forrest, Gaffney, Webb and O'Connor (more likely the first two).  That's while Craig Farrell remains President at least, and while that is the case the combined majors can neither pass nor block by themselves.  

The Legislative Council no longer has a combined major party majority (which had existed for the first time only since 2020) but it still has a combined party majority following Cassy O'Connor's victory (which I think is the first for any candidate endorsed by a non-major party).  

What can be derived from these results?  Firstly, despite a turbulent state election the Liberal Party has clearly got the better end of the stick out of the two majors.  They have retained Prosser and the least worst option for them has got up in Elwick.  (No such luck in Hobart but they had nothing at stake there themselves and it is such a very left seat).  For Labor, 0/3 wins, a seat dropped and with the hindsight of preferences the three results, while not dreadful, are hard to describe as good.  The election of O'Connor to what was once a Labor seat is not good news for Labor either, especially given the Greens' formidable record at defending seats won in single-seat elections.

The Greens have had a whopping win in Hobart and have also done quite decently in Elwick, continuing a good run of support from the state election.  For independents and minor parties the signals are more mixed.  Indies struggled in the Hobart count despite the calls to support independents from the outgoing incumbent and the federal MHR.  Rob Valentine and Andrew Wilkie have been major figures in the Hobart seat for a long time but in my view voters in this seat just do not care that much about endorsements - at least not positively anyway - and haven't done so for decades.   Bec Thomas did win Elwick but it was closer than it might have been.  Some IND/minor party underdogs who had a red hot go polled decent primary tallies (Cangelosi and Bigg for example) but there is not much preference flow between different alternatives and in the south at least the once massive advantage for indies in the LegCo has waned.  

What did the majors gain and lose here?  Labor has lost one seat in winning a second Clark seat they were always going to win, but the benefit is that Josh Willie is now in the lower house and ready to become a major figure from there in the push for a future Labor government (not to mention being a spare potential leader should they need one).  It may seem that the Liberals gained nothing by switching Jane Howlett to the Assembly when they would have won three seats in Lyons anyway, but one advantage is improving their southern-based regional representation.  Had they not tried this, they would most likely have ended up with three northerners as their Lyons MPs again.  (I think, given her strong state election performance, that Howlett would have also won Prosser but it would have been a more turbulent campaign than it was).  

Roll on 2025 when at this stage we have a similar set of seats up to this year's, except that there are not yet any known vacancies:  

* Two-term incumbent and leader for the Government Leonie Hiscutt (Lib) in Montgomery (Lib vs ALP 10.2%), assuming she recontests.

* First-term incumbent Meg Webb (IND) in Nelson (IND vs Lib 9.3%).  Nelson was historically a conservative-occupied seat, and Webb has been consistently among the most left-voting independents in the Council and a high-profile thorn in the government's side. I expect there will be some sort of conservative attempt to defeat her, whether it's a true independent, an endorsed Liberal or something in between.  (One wonders if Marcus Vermey might run after a good showing in Clark.) As some other divisions have shown, once an independent gets elected their political alignment means little if voters think they're doing a good job.  

* First-term incumbent Luke Edmunds (ALP) in Pembroke (ALP vs Lib 13.3%).  Edmunds was elected in a 2022 by-election.  Labor has been very strong in the LegCo on the Eastern Shore in recent years and must be at very short odds to retain.

Oh and roll on mayoral and councillor by-elections for Glenorchy and Sorell in the near future.  Glenorchy could be quite a bunfight.  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4:21 Prosser is over, a strong flow to Green off Sharpe (about 60-40) but not enough, the final margin about 52.9-47.1. Hobart is also over, Labor preferences favouring O'Connor for a c. 59.7-40.3 win over Kelly. Kelly was probably the ideal 2CP opponent for O'Connor to win big but she would also have easily beaten Kamara (I estimate 57-43 having seen a small amount of scrutineering data on this) or Burton in a two-way throw.  

2:53 In Hobart, Burton's preferences are thrown and O'Connor is just below 46% (a bit below the 48% estimate cited on Tasmanian Times but that wasn't that far off); Kelly would now need over 82% of Kamara's preferences to win, it will be interesting to see whether the gap to O'Connor closes, does nothing much or blows out.

2:27 We're down to the final throw in Prosser where Bryan Green now needs 75.3% of Sharpe's preferences assuming zero exhaust, but there will be some small amount of exhaust on this throw.  

2:20 Various claims on election night (and claims since that it would be close) that Labor was going to win or likely to win Elwick have proved to be wide of the mark as Thomas has won pretty easily in the end, 53.34% to 46.66% (subject to minor change).  In fact Thomas made a very small net gain on preferences, 3550 to 3343.  Moreover far from there being flow between Cangelosi and Shelley as might have been expected they were each the lowest scorer on the other's preferences.  That's also the end for now of the combined Legislative Council major party majority, but there is still a combined party majority for what little it matters.

1:52 The interest in Hobart is only the margin and confirming that Kelly is second as now looks highly likely.  Kelly has made a gain on the bulk exclusion and is now about 5.5% ahead of Kamara, who main gain off Burton but most likely not enough.  He would need 68.2% of preferences to win (this won't happen.)

1:50 Spaulding has been excluded in Prosser, with more than half his votes going to Sharpe but leaving Bigg and Sharpe with not enough votes between them to mathematically catch Green.  Green would now need 67.2% of preferences, even assuming zero exhaust.  

Tuesday 12:10 TEC release on the process here.  Note that it is now virtually certain Cangelosi will be excluded first; the margin between Cangelosi and Shelley won't realistically be overturned on outstanding postals even if enough arrive to do so.  In Prosser, Green needs 64.9% of preferences to win (it has come down a bit, but still won't happen.)

Tuesday 11: Rechecking completed, McLaughlin still needs 57.4% of preferences to win. 

Tuesday: I am advised that the TEC's intent today once rechecking is finished is to commence provisional distributions for all seats.  For Elwick the number of postals remaining is enough to possibly change the exclusion order so the TEC will be running both scenarios (Cangelosi excluded first and Shelley excluded first), this may provide for a certain result unless the numbers are so tight that we need to wait for the remaining postals. For Hobart while the exclusion order of Haynes and Campbell is not clear it is clear that all of Haynes, Campbell and Vogel will be excluded so they will be bulk-excluded for the purpose of the provisional throw.  It may then be possible for more exclusions to continue (I think it will) or if necessary they can again run two scenarios.  For Prosser the main question is whether there will be an exclusion order to be resolved between Sharpe and Bigg after the exclusion of Spaulding.  (I suppose it's also possible here that it might be mathematically irrelevant which is excluded first.)  Anyway I think we'll know a lot more by the end of today, or at least tomorrow!  Plans are subject to change.

Monday 5:20 No further numbers to arrive today, the TEC will announce arrangements for provisional preference distributions tomorrow.  In Elwick they might proceed on the assumption that Cangelosi will not now repass Shelley, provided that rechecking does not narrow the current margin.  We will see.  (The current gap is 63 votes).  Dean Winter has said that Labor scrutineers think it is very close.

Monday 1:15: The phone votes in Elwick very slightly increased the asking rate, now 57.4%.  (Bryan Green for anyone still watching now needs 65.2).  

Monday 11:45: TEC has announced that it will be looking at doing provisional distributions this week to attempt to finalise winners.  The TEC can do this where the number of votes outstanding (unreturned postals etc) are too small to affect the result.  I would not expect those throws to occur today as the recheck will presumably be completed first.  

In Elwick, an obstacle for provisional throws will be the very close Cangelosi/Shelley situation for third, where Shelley is now back in front by 41 votes as a result mainly of out-of-division votes favouring her (these would have been mainly Elwick votes cast in Hobart).  The preference target for Shelley if she is third to get to second is .501 preferences per vote which is also unachievable in a three-way split.  Thomas's position vs McLaughlin has improved slightly with McLaughlin now needing 57.3% of preferences to win and the lead now out to 5.48%.  In Hobart O'Connor's lead has come down a little to 14.2% but Kelly (who looks likely to finish second) still isn't going to catch that.  Phone votes will be added as postals this afternoon, rechecking is also occurring.

10:15 End of night wrap: Two of the three seats are decided (well I'm just about sure Prosser is decided).  In Hobart we'll have little change in voting pattern but a big change in style and political dynamic as Cassy O'Connor replaces Rob Valentine as the first ever Greens MLC.  But it looks like she will not just win but win by plenty, as the end result of a long-running and very enthusiastic Greens campaign.  Campaigns to elect independents here ran the usual line about the problems of major party dominance in a house of review but these lines didn't really make sense as applied to the Greens.  

In Prosser Sorell Mayor Kerry Vincent has managed to match the party's state election vote while Labor has fallen a bit short of that and the Liberals are set to retain the seat.  I thought Vincent's rationale for running and performance generally on the ABC Mornings interviews was one of the best performances I've heard from a party candidate.  The government will be relieved as they retain their fourth Council seat and get more useful experience on board.

Elwick remains up in the air pending some scrutineering intel that will hopefully arrive in the next few days.  The underdogs Shelley and Cangelosi have both performed very well, McLaughlin's primary vote is solid and Bec Thomas has not dominated the field to the extent widely expected.  There's a widespread belief online that the linkage of Thomas to the Liberal Party by opponents during the campaign will stick and preferences will flow to Labor in a case where a centrish-sounding independent would normally be well placed.  But I'm not sure whether voters will have seen it that way yet.  

Not much change in the balance of the Council then, possibly none depending on what transpires in Elwick, but plenty to chew over in various performances here over the days to come.  

There is no counting on Sunday, with rechecking to start on Monday and out of electorate prepolls, phone votes, Antarctic votes and more postals to add.  

9:28 Prepolls are in in Elwick and Cangelosi overtakes Shelley and is now third!  He's 131 ahead and the remaining votes to come will do stuff-all so there's a high chance he stays there.  If he does, he needs to beat Labor off Shelley at the rate of .547 votes per preference in a three-way split with Thomas (so that would be something like a 70-15-15 split).  This is of course impossible, but given that Cangelosi's campaign has already defied all known forms of political reality and still polled 19%, we'll let the internet have its fun.  Thomas made a large gain on prepolls and has 33.96 to 28.90 - this means McLaughlin needs a 56.9-43.1 split on preferences to win.  Normally an independent would win really easily from here, this one has not been normal and I'd like to see some scrutineering on it.  

9:12 I am struggling to see a reason not to call Prosser as well.  

9:01 Prepolls are in in Hobart and Burton is a little further back behind Kamara and would not be able to get enough preferences anyway.  Cassy O'Connor (Green) replaces Rob Valentine (IND) who has retired as MLC for Hobart.  

8:45 Prepolls in and final for night in Prosser where Vincent has jumped out to this: Vincent 38.71 Green 28.46 Bigg 12.84 Sharpe 10.77 Spaulding 9.27.  Some small percentage of voters would number neither Vincent nor Green and their votes will exhaust, but even if this was compulsory preferencing Green would now need a very unlikely 65.6% of preferences to win.   He might get that off Sharpe, but the other two, can't see it.  

8:42 Although Vincent's primary vote lead over Green is not enormous he has topped every booth except for three topped by Green (Brighton, Campbell Town and Ross) and Spaulding's home booth of Nubeena.  

8:19 Tasmanian Times has tweeted: "Based on information we have received from scrutineers, elimination of lower candidates then Charlie Burton will lift Cassy O'Connor to about 48%. She will will then win on preferences flow from John Kamara."   On that I'm waiting for the prepolls just to be comfortable that Burton will definitely be eliminated.  

8:14 We have entered the long dark teatime that is the pre-prepolls lull.  

7:53 Hobart postals are in, they were strong for Kelly and not that good for O'Connor but didn't really change the overall picture.  Mount Stuart booth and prepolls to come.  (Edit: Mount Stuart in, didn't do much).  

7:40 Sorell is in and Vincent is out to a 37-29 lead.  Just prepolls and Dodges Ferry to come.  (Edit: Dodges is in, Vincent still 8% ahead.)  

7:37 O'Connor still at 39 with one booth to go plus prepolls and postals.  

7:29 All day booths and postals to hand now in in Elwick but still prepolls to go.  Thomas 31.9% McLaughlin 29% Shelley 19.8% Cangelosi 19.3%.  Cangelosi did well in Glenorchy booth which has put him now very slightly behind Shelley, it's not clear who will be third yet.  

7:25 North Hobart is in and we now have O'Connor 38.8% Kelly 20% Kamara 17.8% Burton 14.7% and 8.7% for the rest.  If it stays like this then Burton's not going to get over Kamara which looks very much like O'Connor can't be caught.  I will wait for the postals and prepolls tonight but this looks extremely strong for a first Greens seat.  (They've done well in Elwick too.)

7:21 One booth and primaries and prepolls to come in Elwick and it looks like Thomas vs McLaughlin in an almost even race off Cangelosi and Shelley preferences.  In terms of Cangelosi and Shelley being more left candidates this might seem good for McLaughlin because of the attempts to paint Thomas as a Liberal, but cross-cutting that is the issue of independence vs party control (how do Greens voters see Labor vs Thomas?)  Will need to see scrutineering on this one (or perhaps even do some!) 

7:18 Too fast to keep up!  Almost every booth is in in Prosser and the numbers have converged on my 35-29 projection (but Sorell still to come).  I think Vincent is doing well here as Bigg has 15% Sharpe 10% Spaulding 10% - perhaps if there is a very strong flow off Sharpe to Green and the others only split evenly Green could still get there 

7:14 My projection for Hobart says the Greens might come down a bit and Kelly up a bit (and he still has North Hobart to come) but I don't think either Kelly or Kamara will be bothering O'Connor's lead on preferences much from here.  The question I see here is whether Burton can get through the field into the top two and then get everyone's preferences but that looks rather difficult and I suspect scrutineering would quickly say the flow is not enough.   

7:07 Booths pouring in in Hobart and O'Connor now has a massive primary lead with 40% and nobody else above 17.  This is looking very good indeed for the Greens, it might even be safely callable now but I am keeping an eye on any possible preference scenarios as we don't know the order of the others.  

6:59 A lot of booths in in Elwick and we have quite a mess with Thomas 30.5% McLaughlin 28.2% Shelley 22.3% and Cangelosi 19.0%.  Entering into projection now.  My projection thinks Shelley will drop back a fair bit but I am not sure why it thinks that and am checking for any issues, it also thinks McLaughlin will come up in some of the booths to come.  On these numbers there is an in theory possibility that Shelley will bump one of the others out of the top two but despite Cangelosi having run a distinctly left campaign I doubt the flow to her would be strong enough.  

6:54 Albeura St (Battery Point West) is in in Hobart with O'Connor with a large lead but a spray of votes between the top four.  Off that booth O'Connor would project to a primary lead of about 15%.  I've also seen a very small sample of preferences from one booth with Kelly prefs flowing to Kamara vs O'Connor and Burton prefs flowing the other way, both rather strongly.  

6:51 My projection still thinks the lead for Vincent will narrow and Green will come up; it currently expects about 35-29.  But one possible issue with that will be Vincent doing well in Sorell.  With Bigg still ahead of Sharpe and on an impressive 15%, Vincent seems to be well placed at the moment.  

6:45 A massive dump of booths in Prosser sees Vincent now leading 33-25, I am entering those into my projections.  The first Elwick booth is also in, it's Mobile - interestingly McLaughlin (Labor) has topped those 67-57.  

6:44 Three lightning fast booths but nothing more for 20 minutes since!  Expect more not far away.

6:27 Two more in in Prosser.  Coles Bay was pretty good for Vincent (Carlton is an unmatched booth in my system).  My projection currently has Vincent ahead of Green 36-30 (on numbers like that those two would be clearly the final two) but also need to see if the Bigg vote stays reasonably Bigg which might help Vincent.  Spaulding is also going OK, my feeling is his preferences will not do much either way.  What I am not seeing early is Sharpe projecting way ahead of the other minor candidates (which could be a problem for Vincent if it happened.) The count will be slower in Hobart and Elwick, Prosser has a lot of small booths.  

6:23 First booth in (Prosser) is Broadmarsh.  Vincent with a narrow lead over Green but there is also a really high Bigg vote in this booth (close to the Derwent Valley) so this one doesn't tell us anything about which major party is better placed yet.  

6:20 All spreadsheets ready to go (I think).  In my sidebar Not-A-Polls of reader predictions of who would win, O'Connor and Thomas are heavily favoured but for Prosser 50 viewers tipped Kerry Vincent (Lib) to 49 for Bryan Green (ALP).  Will we get actual results that close?  

6:02 Polls have closed.  

  


Intro

Welcome to Super LegCo Day!  It's not unusual to have three Legislative Council seats up for grabs on the same day but for the first time since 1909 voters will fill three vacancies.  Three of the eight billion people on earth are known to have been alive when voters in Macquarie, Russell and one of the three then rotating Hobart seats filled vacancies caused by retirements that year, in all cases replacing an independent with another independent.  In this case, we have vacancies caused by one retirement and two MLCs running for the lower house and winning (in one case a mid-term by-election).  My guides to the seats are here:  

Elwick 

Hobart 

Prosser.  

At stake (see voting patterns analysis here) are both the left-right balance of the Council and the major party-independent balance of the Council, which going into whatever happens tonight stands at 3 Liberal 3 Labor and 6 Independent, with the vacancies being one Liberal, one Labor and one left independent.  Labor is running officially in all three seats and the Liberals one, though Liberal proxies have been making it clear which indie is the party's desired outcome in two others.  The Greens are running in two with a recognisably green independent (not involved with the party) in a third.  The campaigns (especially Elwick) have generated high levels of social media snark and all three counts should be of interest.  

The vote comes in the aftermath of a remarkable state election where both major parties polled poorly and there was a large swing from the Liberals to crossbenchers, the latter of whom won more seats than the Labor Opposition.  Just overnight the frailty of the government's position was highlighted again with Labor announcing the nomination of Michelle O'Byrne as Speaker (it could well be that she has the numbers) and an unsigned press release from the Jacqui Lambie Network alleging that the government is breaking its agreement with JLN (which was followed by another one today announcing all was fine again.)

Live coverage of the counts will be posted here tonight from 6:00 pm.  A summary appears at the top of the page, seats will only be CALLED when I consider that there is no realistic doubt who has won.  For all seats I will be projecting the votes for various candidates (not all) off the state election.  For Elwick I will project the Labor and Green votes off the state election.  For Prosser I will project Labor, Liberal and SFF off the state election and Sharpe off the state election Greens vote (she is an independent not a Green but should appeal to a lot of the same voters).  For Hobart I am projecting Labor and Green off the state election vote, Kelly off the state Liberal vote (we'll see if that actually works or not, he's not a Liberal) and Burton off the combined vote for every state indie except Louise Elliot.   

I believe all votes on hand will be counted tonight, with postals to come after that (I am not sure what the arrangement is for counting telephone votes).  Over 14,000 prepolls have been cast and 4,500 postals have been sent out with 70% returned already.  However there is no two-candidate count tonight; sometimes provisional two-candidate counts will be done in the days after election night but these days it is more common for the TEC to just wait a week and a half and do the preference distributions after all the postals are in.  

I will be offline and not updating during the day for most of Sunday.

In terms of what to look for tonight, firstly in Elwick it could be that preference flows aren't particularly strong so if somebody has a substantial lead that might be it, though there could be some cross-flow between the left candidates Shelley and Cangelosi if there is any question of either of them making the top two.  If Prosser finishes as a major party contest as mostly expected then Pam Sharpe's preferences could significantly help Labor.  Shooters, Fishers and Farmers preferences normally help the Liberals but Brian Green runs an angling business so I'm not so sure what will happen there.  Hobart features hard to predict preference flows and maybe exclusion orders, I think a candidate would have to have an enormous lead for me to call this seat tonight.  

While I'll be doing projections, regional aspects like favourite-offspring voting may mess with the patterns in Prosser and it may take a while for the pattern there to settle down.  

It is always so exciting when the very first LegCo numbers appear on the night, because there is generally no polling for these elections so it is hard to know what to expect!  

Saturday, April 27, 2024

The Tide Is Going Out For Queensland Labor

...and when the tide goes out in Queensland, they say that it goes out a long way ...

Yesterday's YouGov poll finding the Miles government trailing 44-56 led to a minor outbreak of poll denialism on social media (I've so far seen versions of A4, C4, C6, C8 and C9), but Steven Miles himself was not denying the polling at all, commendably admitting that it looked "most likely" that his government would lose in October.  (Just whatever you do, Premier, don't actually concede before election day!) I haven't covered Queensland polling since I gave the Courier Mail a big roasting for some really bad poll reporting in December 2022 and a return to Queensland polls is overdue.  It happens this time that the poll is so bad for Labor that even the Courier Mail can't spin it as much worse than it is.

It's worth noting that Queensland Labor during its nine years in power has often polled indifferently.  In the 2015-7 term it trailed on 2PP in a third of the published polls, but never worse than 48-52.  In the 2017-20 term there was less polling and there had been a few shabby looking numbers (again no worse than 48-52) before the COVID-19 pandemic arrived in 2020 and lifted all governing boats.  The Palaszczuk government ended up slightly outperforming its final polling, but it was a very sparsely polled election.  Going into the 2024 contest that is now just six months away, it looks like we might see a higher volume.

Sunday, April 14, 2024

Every Child Wins A Prize: Federal Seats With Swings To All Contestants

During last night's Cook by-election count there were a few comments about the swing column.  All six parties/independents had recorded a positive swing from the 2022 election.  In the case of Cook this was not at all surprising - three of the parties and the one independent had not even run in the seat in 2022, so their "swing" was automatically plus.  The Greens were always going to get a primary vote swing with no Labor candidate and no prominent left/centre independent.  That left the Liberals, and the question was whether they could gain enough primaries from the 34.6% who voted Labor, UAP or One Nation in 2022 to compensate for replacing a former Prime Minister and 17-year incumbent with some dude from outside the electorate.  This they did with 7% to spare and lo and behold there's a neat little line of pluses in the swing column for the recontesting candidates:

(Apologies to AEC, I've pinched the Wikipedia version for clearer display)

This is a common event in by-elections where one major party doesn't contest.  It has happened by my count in 9 of 21 such by-elections in the last 50 years, the others being Perth and Batman 2018, Higgins 2009, Isaacs 2000, Holt 1999, Blaxland 1996, Wentworth 1995, and Menzies 1991.  Perth 2018 achieved this feat despite having 15 candidates, however only three parties were recontesting.  Blaxland 1996 had five recontestants - I should note that I treat an independent as such only if it is the same person running and doing so as an independent both times.  

Saturday, April 13, 2024

2024 Cook By-Election: Well I Don't Think I Should Call It "Live", But Anyway ...

COOK (Lib vs ALP 12.4% - ALP not contesting)
Cause of by-election: resignation of former Prime Minister Scott Morrison (Lib)
CALLED 6:46 pm Liberal retain - Simon Kennedy replaces Scott Morrison.  
Liberals win on first preferences. 

----------------------------

9:09 Such postals as are going to be counted tonight is in now, and there is no change to the overall pattern with Simon Kennedy on a primary vote of 62.7% and a 2CP of 70.8%.  Nothing to concern the Liberals in one of their safest seats tonight but it is not in such places the next election will be won and lost. Unless something crops up that needs debunking, that is all from me for tonight.  

8:20 Animal Justice are opening up a gap to the Libertarians for third but postals might narrow this.  Overall the Liberal result is no cause for concern - they would expect some aspect of swing against them over the departure of an ex-PM, but also swings to them because there is no Labor candidate; to come out with a gain of 6.5% out of primary vote off those two things seems fine.  But I wouldn't say it's an especially good result because there's no basis for making such a call when the opposition is so weak.  

Tuesday, April 9, 2024

Tasmania 2024: Is This Hare-Clark's New Normal?



Before and after ...


TASMANIA 2024: LIB 14 ALP 10 GRN 5 JLN 3 IND 3
Changes from 2021-based notional result: LIB -3 ALP -1 GRN +1 JLN +3
(2021 election for 25 seats LIB 13 ALP 9 GRN 2 IND 1)
(Before 2024 election LIB 11 ALP 8 GRN 2 IND 4)

Counting is over for the remarkable 2024 Tasmanian election and now come the negotiations.  The Jacqui Lambie Network yesterday announced it was expecting to release a confidence and supply agreement within days and independents are also being consulted.  Premier Jeremy Rockliff has stated he intends to request to be sworn back in, agreement to which would be automatic by precedent just to give him a chance to test his numbers even if the Parliament did intend to remove him.  But with Labor seemingly not interested in governing if it relies on the Greens in any fashion, the remaining crossbenchers' choice is to find some way to back the Liberals (at least on confidence votes when they happen) or else back the sort of instability that could see them defending their seats again within months.  If what the crossbenchers actually extract from the government right away (if anything) seems modest or embarrassing, that is one of the reasons for that.

Saturday, April 6, 2024

Legislative Council 2024: Elwick

This is my guide for the May 4th election for the Legislative Council seat of Hobart. On Wednesday I released a brief survey of the Council's voting patterns.  Links to other seats: Hobart  Prosser . There will be live coverage on the night of May 4th.  

At the start of this year the Legislative Council consisted of four Labor, four Liberal and seven independents, with three of the independents strongly left-leaning, one centrist, and three somewhat right-leaning albeit still left of the Liberal Party.  Council voting has also seen a rapid increase in "Laborial" bipartisan voting patterns where the major parties combine against some or all of the indies.  The 2024 Legislative Council elections follow hot on the heels of an extremely messy lower house election, and for the first time since 1909 three seats fall vacant on the same day.  The three vacancies are one Labor, one Liberal and a left independent, so the elections are very important for both the left-right balance of the Council and the independent-major party balance.

The election for Elwick is a by-election.  The winner will hold the seat for four years rather than the usual six, and will be up for their first defence in 2028.

Friday, April 5, 2024

Legislative Council 2024: Hobart

This is my guide for the May 4th election for the Legislative Council seat of Hobart. On Wednesday I released a brief survey of the Council's voting patterns.  Links to other seats: Prosser Elwick. There will be live coverage on the night of May 4th.  

At the start of this year the Legislative Council consisted of four Labor, four Liberal and seven independents, with three of the independents strongly left-leaning, one centrist, and three somewhat right-leaning albeit still left of the Liberal Party.  Council voting has also seen a rapid increase in "Laborial" bipartisan voting patterns where the major parties combine against some or all of the indies.  The 2024 Legislative Council elections follow hot on the heels of an extremely messy lower house election, and for the first time since 1909 three seats fall vacant on the same day.  The three vacancies are one Labor, one Liberal and a left independent, so the elections are very important for both the left-right balance of the Council and the independent-major party balance.

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Legislative Council 2024: Prosser

This is my guide for the May 4th election for the Legislative Council seat of Prosser.  Prosser gets to go first because it has the most declared candidates! On Wednesday I released a brief survey of the Council's voting patterns.  Links to other guides: Elwick Hobart .  There will be live coverage on the night of May 4th.  

At the start of this year the Legislative Council consisted of four Labor, four Liberal and seven independents, with three of the independents strongly left-leaning, one centrist, and three somewhat right-leaning albeit still left of the Liberal Party.  Council voting has also seen a rapid increase in "Laborial" bipartisan voting patterns where the major parties combine against some or all of the indies.  The 2024 Legislative Council elections follow hot on the heels of an extremely messy lower house election, and for the first time since 1909 three seats fall vacant on the same day.  The three vacancies are one Labor, one Liberal and a left independent, so the elections are very important for both the left-right balance of the Council and the independent-major party balance.

Seat Profile

Prosser is a fairly large rural and satellite-town seat in the midlands, east and south-east of Tasmania (see map).  Its largest population centres are Brighton, Dodges Ferry and Sorell (all in the south) and other significant centres include Bagdad, Bicheno, Campbell Town, Swansea, Triabunna, Nubeena and Oatlands.  Industries include farming, fishing and what remains of forestry, but around Sorell there has been a rapid increase in young commuting families.

Tuesday, April 2, 2024

Legislative Council Voting Patterns 2020-24

This article is part of my Tasmanian 2024 Legislative Council coverage.  Coverage of the lower house election continues with postcount articles accessible as follows:

Bass Braddon Clark Franklin Lyons Summary

--

In the last four years, Tasmanian Labor has voted more often with the Liberal government than with any of the seven independents in the Legislative Council.  The Liberals have voted more often with Labor than with five of the seven.

I think those are important takeaways to put right at the top of this year's annual curtain-raiser for my Legislative Council coverage.  There are a couple of important aspects at stake at this year's election: not only the overall left-right balance of the chamber but also the balance of major parties vs independents (and where an endorsed Green would fit into that mix).  While such an assessment might fuel concern about the growing "Laborial" mood in our upper house, there are cases where the major parties in my view get it right while the independents don't.  OK, one case - a recent attempt to greatly reduce the scope of Section 196 of the Tasmanian Electoral Act.  

Sunday, March 24, 2024

Tasmania Embraces Chaos: 2024 Election Tallyboard And Summary

TASMANIA 2024: Liberal Minority Government Expected (Subject to will of the parliament)
Labor appears to be not seeking to form government 
Rebecca White resigned leadership, Dean Winter to contest, Josh Willie and others may contest

FINAL RESULT  
LIB 14 ALP 10 GRN 5 JLN 3 IND 3

Links to seat postcount pages Bass Braddon Clark Franklin Lyons

--

Friday 5 April

Dean Winter has publicly announced that he is running for leader, with what he believes is the support of the Labor caucus. 

Informal Vote: Not Good Enough!

Ahead of the release of primary figures the TEC has advised that the informal vote increased from 5.13% in 2021 to 6.31%.  This suggests the informal vote rose with more counting as, eg, cases of duplicate numbers that had been missed on the night were spotted.  6.31% is a bad, though not catastrophic, result.  I warned that an increase in informal voting was likely because votes that were formal at the last election (1-5 with errors later) were informal at this election if the errors were at 6 and 7, but a full review will be needed to detect the specific causes of the increase - which might also be partly down to deliberate informal voting, an increased number of columns, etc.  Certainly I saw some informal votes that should have been saved under transitional savings provisions that I recommended.  In one case a voter had voted 1-6 within the Franklin Greens ticket, leaving a 7th Green blank, then numbered 8-31 in other columns.  The result of this is that their vote did not count at all, whereas in the ACT it would have been good for their first six candidates.  I can only hope that the increased informal rate does not change any outcomes (often it doesn't).   Incidentally, 2024 is the second highest informal vote ever, behind 1946 when for some reason 10.08% of votes were informal (possibly caused by confusing ballot instructions around the introduction of columns).  

The parliament - primarily the government - is to blame for not trying to fix this problem by at least allowing that a vote that was formal in 2021 would be formal in 2024.  However the TEC is also to blame because it has advised the government against measures that might increase exhaust and hence 
"reduce the effectiveness and accuracy of the Hare-Clark counting process".  This stance is addressed in my submission (Hare-Clark Is Not A Rolls-Royce System section) - what really reduces the effectiveness and accuracy of the system is excluding votes from it for no good reason. 

2024 Tasmanian Postcount: Lyons

LYONS (2021 Result 3 Liberal 2 Labor - At election 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 IND)
Notional 2021 7-Seat Result 4 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green

SEATS WON: 3 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green 1 JLN
CALLED WINNERS: Rebecca White (ALP), Guy Barnett (Lib), Jane Howlett (Lib), Mark Shelton (Lib), Tabatha Badger (GRN), Jen Butler (ALP), Andrew Jenner (JLN)
SEAT LOST: John Tucker (IND)

(Links to other seat postcount pages Bass Braddon Clark Franklin Summary)

As I start this piece Lyons is 79.1% counted with the Latrobe polling place still to add on Sunday [EDIT: Latrobe is of course in Braddon so it appears this was an out of division booth that was intended to be counted separately but will now not be.  The reason Lyons is lagging is that it has a much higher out-of-division vote than other seats.]. The Liberals are on 3.01 quotas, Labor have surged late in the night to 2.64, the Greens have 0.83, JLN 0.67, Shooters 0.38, John Tucker 0.26, Animal Justice 0.13 and why did the rest bother.  I expected Lyons to be the hardest seat to follow on the night and it has been but not in the way I expected.  

2024 Tasmanian Postcount: Franklin

FRANKLIN (2021 Result 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green - At election 2 Liberal 1 Labor 1 Green 1 IND)
Notional 2021 7-Seat Result 3 Liberal 3 Labor 1 Green

SEATS WON: 3  LIB 2 ALP 1 IND 1 GRN
CALLED WINNERS: Eric Abetz (Lib), Jacqui Petrusma (Lib), Dean Winter (ALP), Rosalie Woodruff (Grn), David O'Byrne (IND), Meg Brown (ALP), Nic Street (Lib)
SEAT LOST: Dean Young (Lib)

((Links to other seat postcount pages Bass Braddon Clark Lyons Summary)

Warning: The Franklin count involves some complicated weirdness and this page has been rated Wonk Factor 4/5

Franklin has reached a glorious 84.5% counted with no further counting to occur this weekend.  The Liberals have 2.73 quotas, Labor 2.20, the Greens 1.55, JLN 0.39, David O'Byrne 0.72, AJP 0.12 and the rest is minor indies and Local Network.  Rosalie Woodruff has topped the poll and is the only candidate with quota.  

There is no doubt now that David O'Byrne has won as he is an independent and cannot leak votes (unlike the Liberals and Greens), and I suspect he will draw leakage from the Labor ticket as well.   The remaining suspense at party level is whether there is any chance at all for the second Green to beat the Liberals and this appears to be highly unlikely.  On current numbers the Liberals have an effective 1500 vote lead, but are more exposed to leakage with about 6400 potentially leaking votes vs 3800 for the Greens.  I'd expect a higher share of the Greens' votes to leak than the Liberals, such that the differences in leakage rates between the two are probably only worth 200 votes.  Animal Justice preferences will knock another few hundred off the lead but it's extremely difficult to see the Greens winning unless there is a large counting error in their favour.  I am pretty much sure the result will be 3-2-1-1 but want to check it further when more awake.

2024 Tasmanian Postcount: Clark

CLARK (2021 Result 2 Liberal 1 Labor 1 Green 1 IND)
Notional 2021 7-Seat Result 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green 2 IND

SEATS WON: 
2 ALP 2 Lib 2 Green 1 IND
CALLED WINNERS: Ella Haddad (ALP), Josh Willie (ALP), Kristie Johnston (IND), Vica Bayley (Grn), Simon Behrakis (Lib), Helen Burnet (Grn), Madeleine Ogilvie (Lib)

(Links to other seat postcount pages Bass Braddon Franklin Lyons Summary)

Welcome to Clark which had all the fun in 2021 and has thrown up something a little bit unexpected in 2024.  The Independents haven't done quite as well as had been thought, and the seat that could have gone to Sue Hickey appears to have gone to the Greens or Labor instead.  As I start, Clark is 79.3% counted.  Still to come are the booths of Kingston, Kingston Beach, Sandfly and the Kingston prepoll.  Labor has 2.49 quotas, Liberals 2.16, Greens 1.61, Johnston (IND) 0.63, Hickey (IND) 0.40, Lohberger (IND) 0.21, Elliot (IND) 0.15, AJP 0.14, SFF 0.11 and ... oh, why were all these people on my ballot paper.  

Johnston as an independent is too far ahead for Hickey to catch her, especially as Lohberger's voters are more likely to be sympathetic to Johnston.  Also because she cannot leak votes she will most likely beat both Labor and the Greens.  The question is can Labor beat the Greens.  At the moment it looks like probably not.  Both Labor and the Greens have similar leakage exposure, but the votes still to add should be significantly better for the Greens as Labor polled dismally in the Kingston prepoll last time.  The Greens will also be assisted by preferences from Animal Justice and probably from Lohberger.  So I don't currently see any reason why Labor stops Helen Burnet from going to state parliament but it is close enough that this will need to be looked at further.    If Burnet wins this will trigger a recount for her Hobart Council seat (which should go to Bec Taylor, Gemma Kitsos or perhaps Nathan Volf) and Hobart will elect a new Deputy Mayor around the table.  

2024 Tasmanian Postcount: Braddon

BRADDON (2021 Result 3 Liberal 2 Labor)
Notional 2021 7-seat result 4 Liberal 2 Labor 1 IND or 5-2

SEATS WON
3 Liberal 2 Labor 1 JLN 
CALLED WINNERS Jeremy Rockliff (Lib), Felix Ellis (Lib), Anita Dow (ALP), Shane Broad (ALP), Roger Jaensch (Lib), Miriam Beswick (JLN)
EXPECTED: Craig Garland (IND) to beat Giovanna Simpson (Lib) after preferences.  Greens eliminated.

Caution: The Braddon count involves some complicated if seemingly unlikely scenarios, this postcount is rated Wonk Factor 4/5

(Links to other seat postcount pages Bass  Clark Franklin Lyons Summary)

INTRODUCTORY NOTE: What Is Leakage?

Leakage is very important in the Braddon result.  Leakage occurs when a candidate is excluded or elected and some of their votes instead of flowing to other candidates within their party flow to candidates from outside the party or exhaust.  Parties are more prone to leakage when they have candidates who are way over quota or when they have several candidates to be excluded with substantial vote numbers between them.  Independents cannot leak and will often gain on parties through the count.  

2024 Tasmanian Postcount: Bass

BASS (2021 Result 3 Liberal 2 Labor - when election called 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 IND)
Notional 2021 7-Seat Result 4 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green

SEATS WON 3 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green 1 JLN 
CALLED WINNERS: Michael Ferguson (Lib), Rob Fairs (Lib), Michelle O'Byrne (ALP), Janie Finlay (ALP), Cecily Rosol (Green), Rebekah Pentland (JLN), Simon Wood (Lib)
SEAT LOST: Lara Alexander (IND)

(Links to other seat postcount pages  Braddon Clark Franklin Lyons Summary)

--

This year I will do my postcount threads in alphabetical order but some may get more effort at the start than others!   A late-night update in Bass sees the Liberals with 3.04 quotas, Labor 2.40, Greens 0.95, JLN 0.65, Shooters 0.18, Animal Justice 0.12.  The independents are collectively on 0.66 quotas but none of them has any vote to speak of and Greg (Tubby) Quinn is the only one who can hold his head up high, outpolling much more fancied indies who have flopped (though Lara Alexander has just overtaken him).  The count is at 81.9% (it will finish somewhere around 90 probably) and George Town and Scottsdale prepolls are not added yet.

The Liberal vote in Bass has been trashed by an enormous swing currently running at over 20%, but when you start from a base of 60, how bad can it be?    Michael Ferguson has topped the poll with 1.44 quotas in his own right.  Rob Fairs has a little less than half of that.  Ferguson will be the only candidate elected with quota and his surplus will provide boosts to the remaining Liberal candidates.  From then on it will be a long series of exclusions from the bottom up, with occasional surpluses.  Michelle O'Byrne and Janie Finlay will be over quota pretty quickly in that process, and Rob Fairs and Cecily Rosol later.  This leaves two battles.  The first is between JLN and Labor for the last seat at party level and the second is a battle for the third Liberal position.

2024 Tasmanian Election: Late Night Live

This is the late night live blog that fills the void between me finishing my Mercury coverage and unrolling all the seat pages.  It will be used for quick updates over the next hour or so.  

(Updates scrolling to top - refresh now and then)

1:30 Bass is final for night and I nearly have my page for it done.

12:54 An update in Franklin where the Liberals and O'Byrne have moved further ahead of the Greens.

12:48 Finally action in Bass where a first tranche of postals has done very little to the picture and improved JLN's chances but we need to see what the big prepolls do there.  

12:30 An update is through in Clark and Labor have almost matched the Greens total - this is going to be an interesting one!  Note that Helen Burnet has a high personal vote and a high profile and might do well off independent preferences.  

12:25 The count in Bass appears to be stuck or have stopped with no web updates since around 10 pm.  A small update in Lyons with Labor just in front of JLN on notional quotas.  The Greens have dropped back a little but only need to beat one of these two.  

12:10 A note on count progress: Provisionally the TEC will finish tomorrow whatever it doesn't get done tonight as concerns prepolls and early postal batches.  After tomorrow it does not expect to post new figures until Thursday, and then it will be working Easter Monday prior to the start of the preference distribution the day after.  

-----------------------------------------------------


Saturday, March 23, 2024

Tasmanian Election Day 2024

Live link to Mercury coverage here: https://www.themercury.com.au/news/politics/tasmanian-state-election-blog-with-political-expert-kevin-bonham/live-coverage/62c78a2ed4172adcfe9aa5ad77236ab9


----------------

Well we're here again, wherever here is.  What a weird ride this has been.

Tonight the Rockliff Liberal government chases history, for never in Tasmania has a government won four majorities at elections in a row.  Four governments including the current one have won three*.  If the polls are right, history is unlikely to be caught.  One piece of history will be made today with the restoration of the house to 35 MPs.  

Tonight I will be doing live coverage for The Mercury.  The link will be edited in to this article when available.  It may be paywalled but there is usually a cheap introductory subscription for non-subscribers.  My live blog for the Mercury will probably start somewhere around 6:30 and go until not later than 11; it may be wound down late at night as I do interviews and if I need to file an article.  I will be based at the tally room.  I ask media outside of the Mercury not to contact me by phone or email between 5:30 and about 11 tonight; once I have finished the live coverage I should be available quickly for other interviews (feel free to say hi in the tally room when I don't look too busy to arrange).    Scrutineers are very welcome to send me news and figures by phone or email.  

There may be a "late night live" thread.  My plan, energy permitting, is to post postcount threads overnight (between 1-4 am) for all five Assembly electorates.  I will be home tomorrow and available for interviews but no calls or texts before 9 am except if booked tonight.   Also no interviews between 3-5 pm.  

My main guide page is here with links to individual electorate guides and effective voting advice.  For those seeking voting advice, I recommend to number all the boxes or at the least to number every candidate who you think is OK or better.  This may make your vote more powerful and it cannot harm your preferred candidates.  If you vote 1-7 for a party and stop, your vote can play no role in determining which other parties are successful.  Check that you have not doubled or skipped any numbers, especially not between 1 and 5. Do not use ticks or crosses.

Thursday, March 21, 2024

2024 Tasmanian Polling Aggregate

Aggregate of all polls (not a prediction) Lib 36.9ALP 25.3 Green 13.2 JLN 9 IND 12.7 other 3
Seat estimate for this aggregate 15-10-4-3-3.
--

This article is part of my Tasmania 2024 state polling coverage.  Click here for links to my main guide page which includes links to seat guides and effective voting advice.  
--

An attempt at aggregating the 2024 Tasmanian polls has been long-coming amid a very distracting and busy campaign, but for what it's worth here goes.  For the second election running I have doubts about the value of this exercise, but for entirely different reasons.  In 2021 there was very little polling and the only campaign poll to be publicly released appeared to (and did) have large house effects, which I determined using EMRS as a benchmark.  Despite me talking them down, both my house-effects aggregate and my no-house-effects aggregate somehow worked, with the former nailing the seat estimate and the latter recording voting share misses of 0.5% or below on all four lines.   I don't expect to be that lucky this time, however I hope the journey of how I try to come up with a what the polls are saying number will make some sense.

If any more public polls are released before 8 am Saturday a fresh aggregate will be included in the article covering that poll, or in this one.

Tasmania 2024: Yet Another Mystery Poll

This article is part of my 2024 Tasmanian state election coverage.  Click here for link to main page with links to effective voting advice and seat guides.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE 22/3: The Mercury has revealed that this poll was by high-quality pollster Freshwater Strategy and taken about a fortnight ago, and the Fontcast has announced it was THA-commissioned,  New details are also that the Greens are on 13 and Independents 11 in Lyons, the Greens are on 10 in Bass (apparently leaving about 13.7 for independents and others), independents are on 10 in Braddon (leaving about 13.8 for Greens and others) and 28 in Clark (Greens on 20), and in Franklin the Greens are on 13 and independents on 17.  

--------------

Original article

After a reasonably polling-rich start to the 2024 Tasmanian campaign, little polling has been seen recently, with the youngest public poll 16 days out of the field as I write.  This creates a fair amount of uncertainty regarding whether anything has happened with voting intention in what has been a noisy and bumpy campaign.  In particular, has the fact that the Liberals are ahead and are the only party that any poll has had within, say, 5% of a plausible majority result, caused any late bandwagon effect to their side?  (I should note that bandwagons to a party capable of forming majority government don't always happen.  The two elections where conspicuous bandwagons did occur were 2006 and 2018 but for both these elections other factors could be cited.)

Today Sky News has released some figures from a poll by an unnamed pollster and source and have said they have been asked not to name.  As is too often the case Sky have failed to report on the polling dates.  What we have is a purported seat breakdown probably by someone with not much of a clue about how Hare-Clark works (14-9-4-4-4) and primary votes for the majors and JLN only.

The primary votes reported are:

Bass Lib 40.28 ALP 25.87 JLN 10.2 (leaving 23.68)

Braddon Lib 49.24 ALP 14.65 JLN 12.28 (leaving 23.83)

Clark Lib 25.35 ALP 21.37 (leaving an enormous 53.28)

Franklin Lib 33.23 ALP 27.4 JLN 8 (leaving 31.39)

Lyons Lib 38.46 ALP 23.26 JLN 11.2 (leaving 27.18)


Sunday, March 17, 2024

There Aint No Stability Clause

This article is part of my 2024 Tasmanian state election coverage; main page includes a link to effective voting guide and candidate guides and other articles.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I feel somehow responsible, but it is probably coincidence. A few days ago I decided to put a bit of low-level Hung Parliament Club propaganda back in its box by explaining why I do not support four year fixed terms for Tasmania.  Among other things they infringe undesirably on the Premier's ability to seek a fresh mandate when the Parliament goes pearshaped.  I explained at the bottom why I do not consider New Zealand style party hopping laws to be an alternative solution.  Days later, along comes the government with a policy for ... New Zealand style party hopping laws.  What hell is this?  

For those who came in late, we are here in part because the former Gutwein Liberal Government preselected one Lara Alexander to run as a candidate for Bass in 2021.  She wasn't seen in the campaign except for her campaign manager complaining that she was being muzzled.  She got next to no votes but was later elected on a recount.  It has subsequently transpired that Alexander is a very odd politician - in particular her talent for inscrutable and apparently self-contradictory comments about confidence in government.  Had the Liberals allowed her to speak for herself before nominations closed this would probably have been obvious within minutes and they could have disendorsed her and picked somebody else.  But they didn't.  We are also here because - for some reason that has never been explained though I've wondered if it was anything to do with this - the Government later decided to make a former TV presenter Primary Industries minister instead of a career farmer, and the latter started or continued accumulating grudges.  

This is not the first time the Liberals have had unity problems - in the previous term Sue Hickey nabbed the Speakership against her party's nominee Rene Hidding and then voted against party policy on gender birth certificate reforms and mandatory sentencing.  However Hickey remained a Liberal until she was disendorsed, precipitating the 2021 election.


Saturday, March 16, 2024

Ipswich West and Inala Live

Ipswich West (ALP 14.4% - resignation of Jim Madden (ALP)

   Labor loses seat with 2PP swing of around 18%

Inala (ALP 28.2% - resignation of Annastacia Palaszczuk (ALP)

   Labor retains with 2PP swing in low 20%s.

Comments scrolling to top - refresh every 15 mins or so during counting for new comments

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11:30 End of night wrap: Although the ABC haven't called this seat yet for some reason, I want to make it clear there is no coming back for Labor in Ipswich West and why I called it hours ago.  They are currently over 1300 behind on 2PP counted votes, but adding in primary votes yet to be added that jumps out to over 1500, and it will probably be more (or at least not substantially less) after preferences.  And then, apart from the pretty standard Yamanto booth that has not reported yet (assuming it will do so) there are only about 3000 postals to come and there would have to be a swing to Labor on them, which there will not be (though they may not swing nearly as badly as the booths).  There is nothing in the booth counts to suggest any errors either.   [UPDATE 12:00 Many postals have now been added and have been similar to the booth swing.]

I expected both of these to go over the historic swing averages (in the case of Inala as adjusted for a Premier retirement) but they have done so by close to 10%.  They are reminiscent of the famous Stafford and Redcliffe beltings suffered by the Newman government on the way to the enormous swing against it in 2015.  I am not expecting the Miles Labor government to suffer anything like so large a swing at this year's election but I have for a long time been expecting Labor to lose in October and to probably do so decisively (but it might yet be close).  This is simply what is to be expected given that it will be a nearly ten year old government that is the same party as the party in power federally.  

Aside from the LNP, tonight's other winner is Legalise Cannabis who have again done very well in a by-election, including beating One Nation in a seat where One Nation was finishing second at a general election as recently as 2017.    

Thursday, March 14, 2024

Why I Don't Support Fixed Four Year Terms For Tasmania

This is part of my 2024 Tasmanian state election coverage (link to main page here including link to effective voting advice), but is also a standalone article.

-----------------------------

The last two Tasmanian Parliaments have ended early.  The 2018-2021 parliament ended ten months early after independent-minded Liberal Sue Hickey was disendorsed and quit the party, and then-Premier Peter Gutwein argued the loss of the Liberals' majority meant an election was desirable.  The 2021-2024 parliament has ended thirteen and a half months early following trouble for the Rockliff Government with two backbenchers who moved to the crossbench in May 2022.  Tasmania is the only state that has not moved to fixed-term elections, but there had not been a seriously early election before these two since 1998, and there is a widespread lack of understanding about the historic conventions under which the Governor considers requests for an early election.   (A note that Tasmania's upper house does have fixed terms, but with elections on a rotating basis.)

I covered many of the misconceptions about calling an early election in 2021, and 2024 has seen a lower-level repeat of many of the same incorrect claims.  A Premier who holds the confidence of the House based on votes that have been cast on the floor - whether or not that looks likely to remain the case - is well entitled by precedent to be granted an early election in order to seek a fresh mandate based on newly arising issues or policies, because the workability of the Parliament is in question or for many other reasons.  It is not even clear that a Premier who is well into their term needs much of a reason at all.  The spurious idea that the Premier should test their support on the Parliament's floor before seeking an election has also been doing the rounds again - this confuses what happens at the start of a Parliament to the end.  

Tuesday, March 12, 2024

uComms: Labor Just 23: How Much Stock Should We Put In This?

This article is part of my 2024 Tasmanian election coverage - link to main page including links to electorate guides and effective voting advice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

uComms (Australia Institute) Liberal 37.1 Labor 23 Green 13.7 JLN 8.5 IND 12.8 others 5.0
Seat estimate if poll was accurate Lib 14 ALP 10 Green 4 JLN 2-3 IND 4-5
Poll should be treated with caution.

Today saw the the release of the third Tasmanian campaign poll by an established and identified pollster, this one being a uComms for the left-wing Australia Institute.

From the outset I should note some usual cautions.  uComms polls by automated phone polling (formerly all robopolling, lately a mix of SMS and voice robopolling).  The poll employs very primitive weighting (age, gender and location only, with no attempt to weight by any indicator of political engagement such as education).  At the 2021 election an Australia Institute uComms poll which I disputed at the time (What's This Then?  Commissioned Poll Claims Liberals In Trouble) was hopelessly inaccurate, underestimating the Liberals by over 7% and overestimating Labor by nearly 4 and independents by nearly 5.  There was never any attempt to explain why this poll got it so wrong.  

Tuesday, March 5, 2024

Redbridge Says It's A Multi-Party Mess As Voters Flee Liberals

This article is part of my 2024 Tasmanian election coverage - link to main page including links to electorate guides and effective voting advice


Redbridge Lib 33 ALP 29 Green 14 JLN 10 IND/Other 14
My estimate 13-14 Liberal 10-12 ALP 4-5 Green 2-3 JLN 2-6 IND

The second Tasmanian campaign poll by an established and known pollster is out, with Victorian-centred outfit Redbridge releasing its first ever public poll of Tasmanian voting intention.  The sample size is smallish (753 voters) and the sample is spread out over two weeks (Feb 14-28).  

They have also released these combined breakdowns: Bass/Braddon/Lyons Liberal 35 Labor 27 Green 11 JLN 14 Other 14, Clark/Franklin Liberal 30 Labor 31 Greens 18 JLN 4 (ie 8 in Franklin as not running in Clark) Other 17

There is more to come on this poll, including one of the most amusing crosstabs you will ever see, but for now just a quick note on the voting intention numbers.  The Redbridge numbers are significantly worse for the Liberals than both the EMRS public poll and the huge-sample mystery poll of unknown veracity and quality, and very similar to the YouGov poll from January, except that they have treated the Lambie and IND/others votes more normally.  (They've only listed parties in seats they are running in.)

Redbridge have released a seat estimate of 12 Liberal 11 Labor 6 Green 3 JLN 3 Independent based on modelling off mini-samples.  I would expect off these state primaries (based on testing them against my model of the recent EMRS breakdowns) that the Greens would not do quite so well; six seats off 14% would be very lucky.   I got estimates of 13-14 Liberal, 10-12 ALP, 4-5 Green, 2-3 JLN and 2-6 IND for these numbers.  

Sunday, March 3, 2024

How To Best Use Your Vote In The 2024 Tasmanian Election

This piece is part of my Tasmanian 2024 election coverage - link to main guide page including links to my electorate guides and other articles.  

This piece is written to explain to voters how to vote in the 2024 Tasmanian election so their vote will be most powerful.  It is not written for those who just want to do the bare minimum - if you just want to vote as quickly as possible and don't care how effective your vote is then this guide is not for you.  It is for those who care about voting as effectively as possible and are willing to put some time into understanding how to do so.  

Please feel free to share or forward this guide or use points from it to educate confused voters.  Just make sure you've understood those points first!  I may edit in more sections later.

Please do not ask me what is the most effective way to vote for a specific party or candidate as opposed to in general terms.

Oh, and one other thing.  Some people really agonise about their votes, spend many hours over them and get deeply worried about doing the wrong thing.  Voting well is worth effort, but it's not worth that.  The chance that your vote will actually change the outcome is low.  

Effective Voting Matters!

I'll give a recent example of why effective voting matters.  In 2021 the final seat in Clark finished with 10145 votes for Liberal Madeleine Ogilvie, 9970 votes for independent Kristie Johnston and 8716 votes for independent Sue Hickey.  As there were no more candidates to exclude at this point Hickey finished sixth while Ogilvie and Johnston took the last two seats.  Had the two independents had 1606 more votes in the right combination, Ogilvie would have lost instead, and the Liberals would not have won a majority.  But during the count, 2701 votes had been transferred from Labor and Green candidates to "exhaust".  All these were voters who did not number any of Ogilvie, Johnston and Hickey.  Many would have voted 1-5 for Labor and Green candidates (mostly Labor) and then stopped.  There were enough votes that left the system because voters stopped numbering that the outcome could have been different.

Making Seats "Marginal" At By-Elections Is Meaningless

Last night saw the Labor government get the good end of the stick in the Dunkley by-election, easily retaining a seat that was precariously above the long-term average swing for government vacancy by-elections.  It's no disaster for the Liberals who have got a modest swing with some mitigating factors but they (especially Jane Hume) were out in force last night spinning the outcome as a triumph.  Together with the usual nonsense about first-term governments not in recent decades losing seats and governments not losing by-elections caused by deaths (both based on trivially small sample sizes) I heard a lot about how they had turned Dunkley marginal and they were coming for the seat.

Marginal seat status where a seat is retained is determined by general election results not by-elections (so Dunkley is no more a marginal seat than it was before), but this made me wonder, does getting a seat inside the marginal range at a by-election predict anything at all?  I've found that such seats have historically almost always been retained by the government at the next election, although on average the election-to-election swing has been worse than the national average in such cases.  The idea that the Liberals have put Dunkley in serious danger next time with a swing that is not even bog-average for a government vacancy by-election has no basis.  

Saturday, March 2, 2024

Dunkley By-Election Live

DUNKLEY (ALP, Vic 6.27%)
Jodie Belyea (ALP) vs Nathan Conroy (Lib) and others
By-election caused by death of Peta Murphy (ALP)
CALLED 8:42 pm Labor retain

---------------

Updates appear here, scrolling to the top.  When counting is underway refresh every 10-15 mins for new comments.  

Thursday: Labor is now very close to winning the postal count and the 2PP is now 52.71; it is likely to finish between that number and 53.  The Australian published an incorrect article today referring to a 10% drop in turnout; the count does not finish until all postals that can be admitted are received 13 days after polling day.  The turnout is currently 83.5% and there should be about 1% or so to come; the turnout decline will be smaller than at least 16 of the last 20 by-elections, potentially 18.  Media should not publish turnout doomery articles without consulting with the AEC or someone who has a clue.  

Tuesday: With vote totals unlikely to change by even 1% from here it's worth noting an outstanding performance by the uComms seat poll.  I've been critical of poor results from this pollster recently (especially Tasmania 2021) but this one is remarkably good by seat poll standards especially. uComms' numbers with undecided redistributed are below with the actual current numbers in brackets:

ALP 40.1 (41.1)
Lib 39.3 (39.3)
Grn 8.2 (6.3)
LTN 1.6 (2.5)
Ind/Other 10.8 (10.8)

2PP 52 (52.6)

n=626.

Friday, March 1, 2024

Mystery Poll: Why Are We Still Playing This Game?

(This is part of my 2024 Tasmanian election coverage.  For main page with links to all other pages go here.)

Today's Mercury carried a front-page report of a "phone poll" of Tasmania with a massive sample size of 4000 voters.  Unfortunately the newspaper report did not state who the poll was done by or for, making it impossible to immediately assess how useful it was.  I have been told (officially unconfirmed) that it is for the Tasmanian Hospitality Association and do not yet know the pollster, though the large sample size is most often seen with automated polls like uComms.  (I should also add that Community Engagement was reported in the field by some people early in the campaign, but the issues questions I was told about were different.)

Anyway, at the risk of sounding like a broken record or even more like a polling analyst with severe frustration management issues, it should be required by law for all media reports of polling to state the pollster and the commissioning source.  (Or if not known, all details should be published as this often makes the poll easy to identify).  Media frequently express frustration with governments that are not being transparent.  They must lead the way by reporting basic polling details better and refusing to allow sources to supply polls on the condition that the pollster should not be named.   This is especially so when they run Your Right To Know campaigns.   As for sources who try to prevent media from publishing the details of polls they supply, those should be classified as "juvenile career criminals". 

For what it's worth, this looks like neutral polling by someone who actually wants to know the answer, and not a loaded poll released for political purposes.  That doesn't mean it's necessarily good in quality terms, but it's worth checking out especially if we get clearer details.

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

EMRS: Liberals Have Big Lead But Still Well Short Of 50

This article is part of my 2024 Tasmanian state election coverage - link to main article page

EMRS Liberal 39 Labor 26 (-3) Greens 12 JLN 9 IND 14 others 1 
Liberals would clearly be largest party
Seat estimate if poll is correct Lib 15-16 ALP 10 Grn 2-3  JLN 2-3 IND 3-5
Just one poll - there will be others!

Advance Comments

A quarterly poll by Tasmania's most experienced state pollster EMRS, which has a rather good track record, has just dropped.  It shows a complex scenario that is also, if correct, a sorry one for Labor.  This poll will have the Liberals happy in that it has them as the only party within reach of a majority while Labor are bleeding votes to independents and JLN.  It follows a YouGov poll that differed mainly in having the Liberals in the low 30s and a much higher Lambie vote.   The poll suggests that if there is a hung parliament, it will be one where Labor will only be able to govern deeply in minority with multiple partners, while the Liberals may have simpler paths to government if anyone will help them.  

Sunday, February 25, 2024

Liberal Agrees Tasmanians Are Ostriches

(This is a special article for my Tasmania 2024 election coverage; click here for link to main page with links to other articles)

--

It's been widely expected that when Tasmania's supposed AFL team name is unveiled days out from the election (hmmm) the name will be the Devils, Warner Bros' outrageous trademark nonsense based on their cartoons about our animal notwithstanding. Just in case "Devils" isn't available, I've been scratching my head for an alternative, and I've found one.  We can follow the lead of Liberal Bass candidate Julie Sladden and we can call our team the Tassie Ostriches! Here is a jumper mockup.



Saturday, February 17, 2024

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide: Lyons

This is the Lyons electorate guide for the 2021 Tasmanian State Election.  (Link to main 2024 election preview page, including links to other electorates.)  If you find these guides useful, donations are very welcome (see sidebar), but please only donate in these difficult times if you can afford to do so.  Note: if using a mobile you may need to use the view web version option at the bottom of the page to see the sidebar. 

Lyons (Currently 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 IND). 
(2021 Election Result 3 Liberal 2 Labor)
Most of the state
Rural, outer suburban and forested.  
Lots of tiny dispersed towns that take many years for an MP to work

Friday, February 16, 2024

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide: Franklin

This is the Franklin electorate guide for the 2024 Tasmanian State Election.  (Link to main 2024 election preview page, including links to other electorates.)  If you find these guides useful, donations are very welcome (see sidebar), but please only donate in these difficult times if you can afford to do so.  Note: if using a mobile you may need to use the view web version option at the bottom of the page to see the sidebar.  

Franklin (Currently 2 Liberal 1 Labor 1 Green 1 IND)
(Elected at last election 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 Green)
Eastern shore Hobart (Clarence City), much of Kingborough, Huon Valley, D'Entrecasteaux Channel
Urban/outer urban/treechange/rural

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide: Clark

This is the Clark electorate guide for the 2024 Tasmanian State Election.  (Link to main 2024 election preview page, including links to other electorates.)  If you find these guides useful, donations are very welcome (see sidebar), but please only donate in these difficult times if you can afford to do so.  Note: if using a mobile you may need to use the view web version option at the bottom of the page to see the sidebar.  

Clark (Currently 2 Liberal 1 Labor 1 Green 1 Independent)
Western shore Hobart, primarily Hobart City and Glenorchy City
Inner and outer urban

Thursday, February 15, 2024

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide: Braddon

 This is the Braddon electorate guide for the 2024 Tasmanian State Election.  (Link to main 2024 election preview page, including links to other electorates.)  If you find these guides useful, donations are very welcome (see sidebar), but please only donate in these difficult times if you can afford to do so.  Note: if using a mobile you may need to use the view web version option at the bottom of the page to see the sidebar.  

Braddon (Currently 3 Liberal 2 Labor). 
North-west and western Tasmania including Devonport, Burnie and Ulverstone
Regional/rural/remote

Wednesday, February 14, 2024

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide: Bass

This is the Bass electorate guide for the 2024 Tasmanian State Election.  (Link to main 2024 election preview page, including links to other electorates.) If you find these guides useful, donations are very welcome (see sidebar), but please only donate in these difficult times if you can afford to do so.  Note: if using a mobile you may need to use the view web version option at the bottom of the page to see the sidebar.  

Bass (2021 Result 3 Liberal 2 Labor, as at election 2 Liberal 2 Labor 1 IND)

North-east Tasmania including most of Launceston

Mixed urban/small-town/rural

2024 Tasmanian State Election Guide Main Page

POSTCOUNT

No party has won a majority but the Liberals are the largest party.  

Seat postcount pages will be linked here when written.

Bass

Braddon

Clark

Franklin

Lyons

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the main page for my 2024 Tasmanian state election coverage.  This page will carry links to all the other articles about the election that I write prior to the close of polling, and will contain general big-picture stuff and links to all the specialised articles (once these are written).  It will be updated very frequently.  Each electorate will very soon have its own guide page.  Note that these are my own guides and I reserve the right to inject flippant and subjective comments whenever I feel like it; if you do not like this, write your own.  This guide and all the others will evolve over coming weeks.  

I will be covering the election counting night for the Mercury from the tally room; all post-count coverage will occur on this website.